Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

First Raptor arrives at Tyndall
Air Force Link ^ | Sep 29, 2003 | Tech. Sgt. Dan Neely

Posted on 09/30/2003 12:36:13 PM PDT by Spruce

First Raptor arrives at Tyndall


Raptor lands
TYNDALL AIR FORCE BASE, Fla. -- The 325th Fighter Wing's first permanently-assigned F/A-22 Raptor lands here Sept. 26. Tyndall, an Air Education and Training Command installation, was selected to serve as the Air Force's primary F/A-22 training base. The aircraft was piloted by Lt. Col. Jeff Harrigian, 43rd Fighter Squadron commander here. (U.S. Air Force photo by Steve Wallace)



9/29/2003 - TYNDALL AIR FORCE BASE, Fla. (AFPN) -- The first operational F/A-22 Raptor was delivered to the Air Force’s F/A-22 schoolhouse here Sept. 26.

Tyndall, once known as “The Home of Air Superiority” became “The Home of Air Dominance,” with the arrival of its first F/A-22. The Raptor will eventually replace the F-15 Eagle and sets the foundation for the next generation of combat-fighter pilots.

Lt. Col. Jeffrey Harrigian, commander of the 43rd Fighter Squadron here, flew “Raptor 18” from the Lockheed Martin Corp. assembly plant in Marietta, Ga., to Tyndall. Harrigian’s squadron will train future F/A-22 pilots.

“This is truly a historic event for Tyndall and the U.S. Air Force,” said Brig. Gen. Larry New, 325th Fighter Wing commander. “We’re very excited down here -- both the people here at Tyndall and our local community partners -- about standing up the Air Force’s very first operational F/A-22 squadron, bringing in the next chapter of Air Force history in air dominance and serving our nation.”

“This is a great honor for me personally,” Harrigian said. “I never thought I’d have the chance. This is a huge day, not just for the 43rd and the 325th, but for the entire Air Force and Bay County. I think we’re all really proud to have the airplane here.”

Harrigian thanked the entire Raptor team -- base members, contractors and the community.

“I know it’s been years and years of effort. From the bottom of my heart, I really do appreciate it,” he said. “We’ll do it right here, and just as General New said, ‘this is just the beginning.’ Air dominance will be our job and we look forward to doing that.”

The F/A-22, the Air Force’s premiere fighter, is a multi-role aircraft, designed to perform both air-to-air and air-to-ground combat missions. The Raptor elevates U.S. technological advantages and updates ‘70s technology using stealth, integrated avionics, maneuverability and supercruise (the capability to reach and maintain supersonic speeds without using fuel-expensive afterburners). These characteristics will provide the warfighter air dominance in any battlespace, according to officials.

The F/A-22 is a critical component of the Global Strike Task Force designed to project air dominance, rapidly and at great distances, to counter and defeat threats that will attempt to deny access to our forces. The F/A-22 cannot be matched by any known or projected adversary fighter aircraft.

The 325th FW, which trains F-15 pilots, air-battle managers, intelligence officers and air traffic controllers, was officially selected as the site for the F/A-22 pilot training program in August 2000.

Tyndall is expected to receive 50 Raptors over the next two years.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: aviation; f22; fa22; raptor; tyndallafb; usaf
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-70 next last

1 posted on 09/30/2003 12:36:13 PM PDT by Spruce
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Spruce
Nice to see the Army Air Corps, I mean Air Force upgrading from those old P-51 Mustangs to the new aircraft! Give em hell folks!! ;^)
2 posted on 09/30/2003 12:42:44 PM PDT by RetiredArmy (We'll put a boot in your ass, it's the American Way! Toby Keith)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Spruce


3 posted on 09/30/2003 12:44:37 PM PDT by bedolido (I can forgive you for killing my sons, but I cannot forgive you for forcing me to kill your sons)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Spruce
Tyndall is our "local" AFB here at Panama City.

Can't wait to see the Raptors flying over in training missions.

We've been waiting a long time for this.

I have been told that these F-22A's can guard a huge piece of the country from right here in the Florida Panhandle.

4 posted on 09/30/2003 12:45:21 PM PDT by capt. norm (You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say will be misquoted, then used against you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Spruce
Thank you for the post. This airplane has capabilities that are beyond unbelievable. The only thing wrong with it is that it aint Navy. Something tells me that may be temporary, considering the short legs on the Super Hornet.

My vote would go to the F-23 though. Faster, more range, but just a tad less agile.

5 posted on 09/30/2003 12:48:24 PM PDT by Pukin Dog (Sans Reproache)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bedolido
BTW: The reason his canopy is reddish is the same reason all the Army binoc's have reddish lenses now.

It protects user vision from lasers.

6 posted on 09/30/2003 12:54:14 PM PDT by Lazamataz (I am the extended middle finger in the fist of life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Pukin Dog
My vote would go to the F-23 though. Faster, more range, but just a tad less agile.

Agreed. Plus it looks really cool, too!


7 posted on 09/30/2003 12:57:43 PM PDT by GunnyHartman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: GunnyHartman
The Raptor got the nod due to Thrust Vectoring. It allowed the Raptor to hold a better sustained G, higher corner speed with a more rapid G onset. The Black Widow could almost stay with it without Vectoring because of those huge tailplanes. It beat the Raptor in acceleration and top speed, which to me is more important in the interceptor role. There are no aircraft out there that could get close enough to either aircraft to dogfight before being blown to hell anyway.
8 posted on 09/30/2003 1:05:50 PM PDT by Pukin Dog (Sans Reproache)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: capt. norm
"I have been told that these F-22A's can guard a huge piece of the country from right here in the Florida Panhandle."

That's cause they can cruise at Mach one instead of wasting fuel to achieve Mach One by use of Afterburners as in the Falcon or Eagle.

9 posted on 09/30/2003 1:08:28 PM PDT by Mad Dawgg (French: old Europe word meaning surrender)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Mad Dawgg
Supercruise, baby!
10 posted on 09/30/2003 1:10:30 PM PDT by RoughDobermann (Nuke the site from orbit. It's the only way to be sure.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: RosieCotton
Air Force ping
11 posted on 09/30/2003 1:12:09 PM PDT by Prof Engineer (HHD - Hoppe's #9 is my cologne of choice ;-))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Pukin Dog
What are those flaps on the leading edge of the wing called? I realize they change the camber of the wing to make it more efficient in slower flight. But they can't be fowler flaps as those extend to increase wing size as well as change wing camber.

This is a heck of a beautiful bird. As a former rotorhead crewchief (Army), I would really love to look at it under it's skin.

12 posted on 09/30/2003 1:25:17 PM PDT by bicycle thug (Fortia facere et pati Americanum est.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: bicycle thug
Can't wait to see the Navy's answer to this one.
13 posted on 09/30/2003 1:30:19 PM PDT by Aeronaut (In my humble opinion, the new expression for backing down from a fight should be called 'frenching')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: bicycle thug
Just leading edge slats. They deploy automatically by computer not just for low speed handling, but to improve lift throughout the envelope. They help with AoA control and in turning or pitching ability.
14 posted on 09/30/2003 1:31:06 PM PDT by Pukin Dog (Sans Reproache)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Spruce
Sound of Freedom BUMP
15 posted on 09/30/2003 1:32:04 PM PDT by jrp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jrp
Sound of Freedom BUMP

With the F-22, the Sound of Freedom is very quiet...

16 posted on 09/30/2003 1:34:39 PM PDT by ArrogantBustard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Mad Dawgg
The F-22 can supercruise at over Mach 1.4. However, the F-23 when fitted with the GE-120 engine could supercruise at Mach 1.8. That is over 1200mph WITHOUT burner. The F-22 is heavier with less range.
17 posted on 09/30/2003 1:34:39 PM PDT by Pukin Dog (Sans Reproache)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Mad Dawgg; capt. norm
"I have been told that these F-22A's can guard a huge piece of the country from right here in the Florida Panhandle."

That's cause they can cruise at Mach one instead of wasting fuel to achieve Mach One by use of Afterburners as in the Falcon or Eagle.

It is a good thing for the F-22 that dogfighting one-on-one is no longer necessary. Once the military got done adding weight to the F-22, the Vector Thrust is all that makes it an even match to the F-15, although the F-15 keeps an edge.

18 posted on 09/30/2003 1:43:22 PM PDT by freedumb2003 (Peace through Strength)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: freedumb2003
Pricey sumbitch - hope it works well...

by Christopher Hellman, Senior Analyst, chellman@cdi.org

The Pentagon has ordered the Air Force to cut its planned purchase of F-22 "Raptor" fighters from 325 to 276, a reduction of fifteen percent. The order, signed by the Defense Department?s Comptroller Dov Zakheim, is in response to the Air Force?s recent revelation that the F-22, already plagued by numerous delays and cost overruns, may be a further $690 million over budget. The cost of the F-22 program is currently set at $69 billion, which makes the per unit cost of the aircraft, if only 276 are purchased, a whopping $250 million.

On Nov. 7 the Air Force announced that the F-22 program was as much as $690 million over budget for the engineering, manufacturing and development phase of the program. According to Air Force Chief of Staff Gen. John Jumper, the cost growth was not the result of technological or performance problems, but was due to the fact that the aircraft?s components were costing more than expected. The Air Force appointed a team to examine the situation, determine its severity, and make recommendations about how to avoid similar problems in the future. The Pentagon?s top acquisition person, Edward Aldridge, later admitted that the cost overruns came as a surprise to DoD and Air Force officials.

In the wake of these revelations, a number of high-ranking program officials were sacked. The Air Force announced on Nov. 18 that Brig. Gen. William Jabour, the program executive officer, and Brig. Gen. Mark Shackelford, the system program director, were removed from their jobs. The following day the program?s prime contractor, Lockheed Martin, announced that their F/A-22 program manager Bob Readen had also been replaced. Then, at the end of November, the Pentagon announced the cost overruns would likely exceed $700 million, and could reach $1 billion.

The Air Force?s procurement chief Marvin Sambur expressed his growing doubts about the F-22, indicated that additional problems would force the service to "go back and reevaluate" the aircraft. "This program is on the bubble," said Sambur. He also indicated that rather than attempting to add more money to the program, the predicted overruns in development costs would be offset by cuts in production funding, forcing either greater efficiencies in the program or cutting the number of aircraft produced. Thus, in many ways, this week?s announcement about reductions in the planned buy of F-22s was inevitable.

Yet overall the Air Force remains committed to the program. In September, the service announced that it was redesignating the Raptor as the F/A-22, to highlight the fact that the plane, originally designed as an air superiority fighter tasked with destroying enemy air forces in the air, would be reconfigured to give it a ground attack capability. In announcing the plan, the Air Force indicated that it would seek production of at least 381 of the aircraft, and perhaps as many as 762.

At the same time, the trade publication Inside the Air Force (Sept. 13) quoting unnamed sources in the service and the F-22 program, reported that proponents of the aircraft were attempting to bolster its support on Capitol Hill by promising to deliver some of the earliest aircraft produced to the Air National Guard. Traditionally when new weapons enter service they are first delivered to active duty units, with the guard and reserve receiving them at a later date. According to the story, the unusual plan was being considered in order to persuade the Guard to use its considerable political influence on Capitol Hill to protect the F-22. The sources quoted indicated that the cancellation of the Army?s Crusader artillery program earlier in the year had made all the services nervous about the future of their highest priority programs.
19 posted on 09/30/2003 1:45:10 PM PDT by Gunslingr3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Spruce
Oh what I'd give to do an outside loop in this baby - probably breakfast and lunch?
20 posted on 09/30/2003 1:50:45 PM PDT by sandydipper (Never quit - never surrender!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-70 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson