[sam_paine]

Wonder why he would respond? Seems like their first rule would be to not respond to anyone who's obviously pro-Fox...I mean they're not going to convert them, and they're leaving a paper (email) trail of their bias....

Actually, I got into it once with Jamie McIntyre about missile defense, and he defended himself admirably. He was wrong, but at least he responded. I give the CNN folks credit for that, at least. I've never heard back from Brit Hume.

[Lance Romance]

I did thank Aaron for responding, but I had to point out that I was mad about anything they didn't cover, but instead how they covered it.

They did two segments in which only the Novak statement on his sources and the Wilson retraction were allowed to stand alone. They were just played and he went back to sliming Bush. The transcript bares this out.

[norwaypinesavage]

"Wonder why he would respond?"

In my opinion it's because Lance Romance's comments hit home. He obviously felt the need to argue with them. If the comments were irrelevant, he would have zapped the email.

[ItisaReligionofPeace]

CNN is probably just happy that someone is still willing to write them. Brit Hume is great.

[GOPrincess]

"I've never heard back from Brit Hume."

I have. :)