Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ad Infinitum
Forbes.com ^ | 09.29.03 | Allison Fass and Peter Kafka

Posted on 10/01/2003 7:00:08 AM PDT by NotQuiteCricket

Coming up after these messages from our sponsors: more messages from our sponsors.

Fearless Prediction: This fall one of the hapless makeover subjects in Queer Eye for the Straight Guy, the hit cable show on Bravo that also runs on NBC, will likely be deemed to have inadequately gleaming teeth. The solution? Crest Whitestrips. Procter & Gamble makes Crest, and it is now in talks with NBC to feature the strips in at least one episode of the new series as part of a broader ad deal.

Brace yourself for more of the same: product pitches inside the shows themselves. The new ads-inside entail far more than plopping a can of Coke into the foreground. Networks are inviting advertisers to help devise the plot or the look of a program to better showcase their brands. The aim is to cut through the clutter--and, though most TV executives won't admit it, to reach fidgety viewers who zap ads assiduously.

"People are not watching the commercials. The advertising guys at the networks are scared, and so are the agencies trying to find another way to do this," says Richard Frank, former president of Walt Disney Studios. He now is managing partner at Integrated Entertainment Partners, a new Beverly Hills shop working to make client products central to TV and movie plots.

The onrush of "reality" shows (no actors, no scripts, just regular folks and countless unblinking cameras) sparked this subliminal blitz. The new approach can be sort of subtle: Don't be surprised to spot a vintage Johnson & Johnson billboard on a ballfield circa 1909 in a made-for-TV movie on Spotlight Presentation, a TNT cable series paid for by J&J. Or painfully obvious:For Pepsi Smash, a summer concert series on the WB network, the cola company helped design the set and pick the hosts.

The industry calls this "brand integration," a nascent business (maybe $100 million this year) that is growing at least as fast as viewers are tuning out. And networks can exact a few extra sponsor dollars, up to a 20% premium in a spot-market buy.

Viewers with long memories (and long in the tooth) will notice a rerunlike quality to the strategy. In TV's earliest days, advertisers, as they had in radio, routinely produced their own programs and gave their products starring roles. Milton Berle's Texaco Star Theater, which debuted in 1948, later became the Buick-Berle Show. I Love Lucy had opening credits that originally featured Lucy and Ricky stick figures frolicking around a box of Philip Morris cigarettes.

But after the quiz show scandals of the late 1950s, networks took control of their programming and generally confined sponsors to 60-second spots. By the 1980s product placements took hold in Hollywood films. The best plant:Reese's Pieces in E.T. The Extra-Terrestrial in 1982. In 1988 CBS shyly placed a Coke vending machine in the faculty lounge in a short-lived high school drama called TV101, keeping it in the background. The reality boom intensified the effort and made it more brazen. Starting in 2000, CBS and Survivor executive producer Mark Burnett featured products advertised on the show. Hungry contestants were rewarded with Doritos and Mountain Dew.

The new format is changing television offscreen, too. Hollywood talent agencies are marketing their connections. Heavyweight talent shop Creative Artists Agency claims credit for marrying Coca-Cola with Fox's American Idol, giving Coke an omnipresent role. The judges drink from Coke cups, and contestants are interviewed in a "red room" done up in Coke's signature color.

In some cases advertisers or their agencies cover all production costs themselves, offering free content in exchange for putting their products at center stage--and even at times the agencies pocketing a share of the show's ad sales. NBC's The Restaurant, this summer's six-episode reality show about a New York bistro, is the first prime-time series in decades produced in part by an ad agency, the Interpublic Group of Cos. One executive producer credit goes to an agency suit: Robert Riesenberg, who heads up production unit Magna Global Entertainment. Interpublic shouldered the show's $1 million-per-episode cost, then recouped it by selling half of the ad slots to three clients. NBC got a free show and the other half of the commercial time. The three advertisers--Mitsubishi, Coors Light and American Express--also had supporting roles.

(Excerpt) Read more at forbes.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: advertiser; advertising; commercials; placement; production
This is an interesting development.
1 posted on 10/01/2003 7:00:08 AM PDT by NotQuiteCricket
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: NotQuiteCricket
I believe Seinfeld used to do this all the time: Baby Mints for example. Hey, maybe they'll eventually dump commercials entirely!!!

Naaaaaaaaa.

2 posted on 10/01/2003 7:04:10 AM PDT by theDentist (Liberals can sugarcoat sh** all they want. I'm not biting.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NotQuiteCricket
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/992929/posts (cross reference)
3 posted on 10/01/2003 7:06:02 AM PDT by NotQuiteCricket (http://www.strangesolutions.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NotQuiteCricket
This has been going on for years.

The next time you watch a show, watch the characters' usage of brand name products that are marked with the product's brand name and/or logo (like a can of pop, for example). Note that for some odd reason, you can usually clearly read the logo from your camera angle when the object is used or when it's set down on a table or something. Odd, isn't it? Don't you always orient a can of pop so that the whole logo can be read by people off to the side? Just coincidence, I figure.
4 posted on 10/01/2003 7:27:01 AM PDT by RonF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RonF
Sure, but I think that this is "new" because they are allowing advertisers to get involved in the production of the show, and in the show's story.

After the whole gameshow thing, apparently the networks cut the advertiser out of (blatent) show development. They are regressing back to what tv was in the 50s.
5 posted on 10/01/2003 8:43:14 AM PDT by NotQuiteCricket (http://www.strangesolutions.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson