To: .cnI redruM
"After her name appeared in Mr. Novak's column"
Mr. Novak ought to "fess up", even though his precious rights as a reporter keep him from "revealing a source" WHy should tax-payers pay for a special investigation when this fellow has NO legal obligation not to reveal his source?
I Personally believe that Novak got the info from the dems or wilson himself in order to create scandal for the white house. This is how the socialist-democrats work - it is obvious tactic which should be IGNORED by the general public as insubstantial socialist whinings.
4 posted on
10/02/2003 6:54:57 AM PDT by
Roughneck
(Like Terrorists? Vote for democrats in 2004.)
To: Roughneck
Only a RAT could make the type of accusations Wilson is making without providing ANY proof. I guess Rush is right, it's not the evidence of the crime, but the seriousness of the charge that counts. Our local morning radio liberal is now saying that the White House committed Treason. When I called to ask how he could come to this conclusion and what proof he had, he hung up on me.
6 posted on
10/02/2003 7:02:47 AM PDT by
anoldafvet
(Democrats: Making the world safe for terrorists one lie at a time.)
To: Roughneck
I agree with you 150%. It's about time to put the cards on the table...which tells me that Novak is right smack in the middle of the democrat's mess.....he can't tell the truth because that would back fire on the democrats....and exonerate the White House...Robert Novak's credibility just went down the rat hole.....
11 posted on
10/02/2003 7:16:30 AM PDT by
smiley
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson