Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CA: World's other forests feed state's appetite for timber
Sac Bee ^ | 10/5/03 | Tim Knudson

Posted on 10/05/2003 7:44:46 PM PDT by NormsRevenge

Edited on 04/12/2004 5:59:04 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

Thick as a phone book, a new state report on the environment cites a little-recognized danger to global forests: California.

By consuming "vast amounts of ... wood products" while increasingly protecting our own forests from logging, Californians are sharpening the pace of cutting elsewhere, including Canada, says a draft of the report "The Changing California, Forest and Range 2003 Assessment," obtained by The Bee.


(Excerpt) Read more at sacbee.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Extended News; US: California
KEYWORDS: appetite; california; environment; forests; timber; worlds
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-50 next last

1 posted on 10/05/2003 7:44:47 PM PDT by NormsRevenge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: farmfriend; Carry_Okie; madfly; SierraWasp
TIMMMMMMBERRRRRRRRRR!!!!
2 posted on 10/05/2003 7:46:49 PM PDT by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Oh the horror. Meanwhile New England has more forest land than it did in 1700.
3 posted on 10/05/2003 7:47:36 PM PDT by Torie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
Aww man! Enough of the fundraiser posts!!!
Only YOU can make fundraiser posts go away. Please contribute!

4 posted on 10/05/2003 7:49:16 PM PDT by Support Free Republic (Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
California should do the right thing, and build all homes and offices from adobe. Clay tablets could easily replace paper.

Everything possible should be done to spare every tree on the planet, because timber is not a crop. It's some sort of weird sacred life form.

5 posted on 10/05/2003 7:53:49 PM PDT by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Torie
Meanwhile New England has more forest land than it did in 1700.

You're not kidding. I just spent the whole summer walking through a tiny part of it. Until I started walking several miles a day, I never realized how many trails there were within just a few miles of my house. There are about 200 miles of marked trails within a five mile radius of where I live.

Flying from Manchester, NH to Birmingham, AL recently, I couldn't help but notice that it was pretty much all forest the entire way with a few cities and towns poking through at times. The entire eastern seaboard of the U.S. appears to be mostly woodlands.

6 posted on 10/05/2003 7:59:16 PM PDT by SamAdams76 (212.4 (-87.6) Homestretch to 200)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
heck, the plains pioneers built their homes out of sod.. I don't know how that would go over in Bel Air and Pacific Palisades but..

and I agree, plants have feeelings too, yaknow. ;-)
7 posted on 10/05/2003 7:59:41 PM PDT by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
What's so funny about all this is that it's moot. As soon as the Russkies realize it and put infrastructure in place to do something about it, we'll all buy 100% of our lumber from them. They have enough timber to house the world for the next 500 years.
8 posted on 10/05/2003 8:00:44 PM PDT by Migraine (my grain is pretty straight today)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
They could start by not wasting the newsprint used to print the LA Times!
9 posted on 10/05/2003 8:03:12 PM PDT by F-117A
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: F-117A
... and Ninth Circuit decisions!
10 posted on 10/05/2003 8:03:53 PM PDT by F-117A
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
"By consuming "vast amounts of ... wood products" while increasingly protecting our own forests from logging, Californians are sharpening the pace of cutting elsewhere, including Canada, says a draft of the report "The Changing California, Forest and Range 2003 Assessment," obtained by The Bee."

DARN I'm glad that was only water I was drinking!

Good thing many states "elsewhere" have good forestry management policies, and the most heavily logged states continue to have the most forest. According to environazis, this should not be possible, and these states shouldn't have any forests left.

11 posted on 10/05/2003 8:04:13 PM PDT by cake_crumb (UN Resolutions = Very Expensive, Very SCRATCHY Toilet Paper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cake_crumb
Yup NewEngland is mostly forest...In soem places moreso than when the Piligrims arrived ( the costal regions had been cleared for agriculter by the indians for 3 miles of so in most places)

150 years ago all of newenglad to around Bangor Maine was 80% or so cleared for farmland. and guess what? it all grew back on its own...
12 posted on 10/05/2003 8:19:05 PM PDT by AlextheWise1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: AlextheWise1
"150 years ago all of newenglad to around Bangor Maine was 80% or so cleared for farmland. and guess what? it all grew back on its own... "

Yeah, plants are like that. The environazis have people convinced that once they're cut, forests will never grow back....then force environmental policy that creates the conditions for devestating wildfires that kill everything, even the microbes in the dirt, cause the soil to erode away and allow invasions by noxious, non-native weeds.

I've never understood how people could believe it's better to burn than to tend and nurture. I can see me now, tending my flowerbeds with a flamethrower instead of a dandilion digger.

13 posted on 10/05/2003 8:31:32 PM PDT by cake_crumb (UN Resolutions = Very Expensive, Very SCRATCHY Toilet Paper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Torie
"Oh the horror. Meanwhile New England has more forest land than it did in 1700."

Alabama is 73% forest (not cotton fields like everyone thinks) and it is increasing by one million acres a year.

14 posted on 10/05/2003 8:39:18 PM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: blam
I was amazed to see that in Alabama, West Tennessee and Mississippi, even way back when in the early 1970's when I drove through. The only place I saw the "real" thing, cotton fields with hands picking it in the sun, was in the delta region of Arkansas.
15 posted on 10/05/2003 8:41:43 PM PDT by Torie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: blam
Of course, much of that Southern forest is just producing pulp fiber for the New York and Los Angeles Times.
16 posted on 10/05/2003 8:43:56 PM PDT by Torie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
If only the LA Times and the San Francisco Chronicle would do the right thing and stop chopping down all that pulpwood!! Have they no sense of civic responsibility?
17 posted on 10/05/2003 8:50:38 PM PDT by cookcounty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Torie
"Of course, much of that Southern forest is just producing pulp fiber for the New York and Los Angeles Times."

LOL. Pulp Fiction.

18 posted on 10/05/2003 8:51:03 PM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
There doesn't seem to be a connection here that we should harvest our forest to produce and control wood as a natural resource for the growth of this country just as we should drill for oil here as well. Bulid the needed refineries and clear out the forest so new trees can grow and underbrush is not a catalist for thousands and thousands of acres of wood lost to fire. Common sense for our economy, our way of life, our very government is lost on environmentalists. Environmentalist distain our republic and Man's position in the nature of things. They should be outed and made to live by what they preach. No modern conviences, wild animals roaming anywhere, preindustrial age manufacturing and economy, no private property rights (not for you anyway, but try to go into a conservation area and pick a flower or even a rock), make them take their environmentalism out of our schools (talk about no seperartion of 'church' and state, and the list goes on and on. A revitalization of the power of the Constitution (the supreme law of the land) and it's Bill of Rights, common sense, and a belief in that America is right, will overcome this political correct malaise that has blinded America. Environmentalists are bloodletting this country do death. I have 17 different environmental departments in my local county but not one on protecting private property.
19 posted on 10/05/2003 9:18:18 PM PDT by Jonathan E
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Support Free Republic
I just contributed already!!! You got blood out of a turnip!!! Sorry it was so anemic. As Bill said to Monica... Keep up the good work!!!
20 posted on 10/05/2003 9:21:10 PM PDT by SierraWasp (I prefer consistent "Considerate Conservatives," to "Compassionate Conservatives," everytime !!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-50 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson