Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Yom Kippur War;The Last Nuclear Moment
The New York Times | October 6,2003 | Avner Cohen

Posted on 10/06/2003 10:35:26 PM PDT by the_greatest_country_ever

The Last Nuclear Moment By AVNER COHEN
Since the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in August 1945, the world has come to the nuclear brink only twice. The first, and better known, was the Cuban missile crisis of 1962. The second, and much less discussed, occurred in the early days of the Yom Kippur war, which began 30 years ago today.

The shock Israelis felt at the Egyptian-Syrian surprise attack on Oct. 6, 1973, can best be compared to that felt by Americans after the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor. Israel was caught totally unprepared: the government had assumed that its intelligence services would be able to alert it at least 48 hours before any invasion.

Yet, while Israeli intelligence had detailed knowledge of Egyptian and Syrian war plans, and Prime Minister Golda Meir had even been secretly warned of an imminent war by King Hussein of Jordan on Sept. 25, the information was not translated into military preparedness. This colossal failure — due to a combination of arrogance, self-deception and misperception — is part of Golda Meir's legacy.

Only in the early morning of Oct. 6 did the Israeli leadership finally understand that it was facing a full-scale attack by Egypt and Syria that very evening. (And even then they had the estimated time of the attack wrong; the war actually started at 2 p.m.) By the next morning, the Egyptian Army had crossed the Suez Canal and columns of Syrian tanks had penetrated deep into the Golan Heights. Hundreds of Israeli soldiers had died in a heroic but hopeless effort to save small, isolated strongholds along Israel's borders.

The hope was that with the arrival of Israel's reserve troops, the military situation would turn around. While this happened to some extent on the Syrian front, things were still a disaster at the Suez. Israel's first attempted counterattack on Oct. 8 was a miserable failure. At the end of that day, Defense Minister Moshe Dayan was heard murmuring about "the end of the Third Kingdom." The commander of the air force, Gen. Benny Peled, warned that with the rate of losses his forces were enduring, within a week Israel might no longer have any effective air power. It was arguably the darkest day in the history of the Israeli Army.

It was in the early hours of Oct. 9 that senior Israeli military leaders brought up the idea of using Israel's doomsday weapons. By that time Israel had lost some 50 combat planes and more than 500 tanks — 400 on the Egyptian battlefield alone. According to a new book by the Israeli journalist Ronen Bergman, when the prime minister's top military aide heard those ideas, he begged the army's deputy chief of staff, tears in his eyes, "You must save the people of Israel from these madmen."

Later that morning, at the end of a somber briefing before the war cabinet, Mr. Dayan raised the nuclear option with the prime minister. No detailed record has surfaced as to what exactly Mr. Dayan proposed, but we know he gave an overall assessment that Israel was fast approaching the point of "last resort." And certainly Mr. Dayan wanted the United States to take notice that things had reached such a point. That he meant using nuclear weapons (albeit in coded language, as at the time nobody dared call them by name) was confirmed in an interview last week by Naftali Lavie, who was Mr. Dayan's spokesman during the war.

This set the stage for a moment that defined Golda Meir's other legacy, her nuclear legacy. Supported by other members of her war cabinet — notably the ministers Israel Galili and Yigal Allon — she refused to concede to Mr. Dayan's gloom and doom rhetoric. Her idea, instead, was to fly secretly to Washington and, as Henry Kissinger later wrote, "for an hour plead with President Nixon." Mr. Kissinger flatly rejected that idea, explaining such a rushed visit "could reflect only either hysteria or blackmail." By that time, American intelligence had signs that Israel had put its Jericho missiles, which could be fitted with nuclear warheads, on high alert (the Israelis had done so in an easily detectible way, probably to sway the Americans into preventive action).

Mr. Kissinger instead started to arrange air supply to Israel, and within three days a tremendous United States airlift to Israel was in action. The tide was turned. By Oct. 21 the Israelis were within 20 miles of Damascus and had crossed the Suez Canal, encircling the Egyptian Third Army. A permanent cease-fire was established within a few days.

Like John F. Kennedy a decade earlier, Golda Meir had stared into the nuclear abyss and found a path back to sanity. Mrs. Meir's decision not to accept Mr. Dayan's pessimism not only avoided a nuclear catastrophe, it demonstrated to the world that Israel was a responsible and trusted nuclear custodian.

Ultimately, Mrs. Meir's nuclear legacy goes far beyond those days in October 1973. Her prudence contributed significantly to the creation of the nuclear taboo — the recognition that nuclear weapons are not like any other weapons humanity has ever invented; that under virtually any circumstances they must never be used.

In this sense, her legacy is as relevant today as it was 30 years ago.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Israel; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: nuclearweapons; yomkippurwar
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last
How do we know that this story is true and not just more of the same Zionist propaganda the Jews broadcast through their own western media organs to further the interests of the Zionist entity? [Sarcasm Off]
1 posted on 10/06/2003 10:35:27 PM PDT by the_greatest_country_ever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: All
CHEAP THRILLS - $1 (the first one's free!)

If every FR member gave a buck a month, we wouldn't need fundraisers. Donate Here By Secure Server

Or mail checks to
FreeRepublic , LLC
PO BOX 9771
FRESNO, CA 93794

or you can use

PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com

STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD-
It is in the breaking news sidebar!

2 posted on 10/06/2003 10:36:53 PM PDT by Support Free Republic (Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: the_greatest_country_ever
Ah, how quickly the writers at the New York Times forget...that India and Pakistan went to the brink of nuclear war two years ago.
3 posted on 10/06/2003 10:41:33 PM PDT by Southack (Media bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: the_greatest_country_ever; rmlew
Yet, while Israeli intelligence had detailed knowledge of Egyptian and Syrian war plans, and Prime Minister Golda Meir had even been secretly warned of an imminent war by King Hussein of Jordan on Sept. 25, the information was not translated into military preparedness. This colossal failure ? due to a combination of arrogance, self-deception and misperception ? is part of Golda Meir's legacy.

Similar to the Stalin's denial prior to Barbarosa. Soviet spy Richard Sorge knew all about the plans for the German invasion of the Soviet Union from his espionage in Tokyo, but Stalin refused to believe him.

4 posted on 10/06/2003 10:47:54 PM PDT by Paleo Conservative (Do not remove this tag under penalty of law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative
There are many, many reasons why your comparison of Golda Meir with Josef Stalin in the context of this article's subject matter is wholly inaccurate and misleading.
5 posted on 10/06/2003 10:56:48 PM PDT by the_greatest_country_ever (Shudder the dystopian nightmare of a world without the greatest country ever. God Bless America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: the_greatest_country_ever
I'm only making a very restricted comparison as to their failures to heed credible evidence of a potentially regime ending attack on their country. Morally there is no comparison between the two. Stalin was a monster who was at least as bad as Hitler.
6 posted on 10/06/2003 11:06:42 PM PDT by Paleo Conservative (Do not remove this tag under penalty of law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative
My comment was made strictly from a historical perspective. Certainly I never assumed you were comparing the two in terms of their moral character.

Stalin was being besieged from every conceivable allied governmental source even from his very own intelligence gathering networks warning him about Hitler's inevitable attack,the most emphatic of all from Great Britain and to which in every case he dismissed out-of-hand.

Stalin believed that all the various reports of an imminent German invasion were all part of the same desperate allied plot towards convincing him to open a second front on Nazi Germany. He even steafastedly refused to fortify his troops on the German-Soviet border so as not to give Hitler the slightest pretext for invasion.

7 posted on 10/06/2003 11:56:26 PM PDT by the_greatest_country_ever (Shudder the dystopian nightmare of a world without the greatest country ever. God Bless America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: the_greatest_country_ever
By Oct. 21 the Israelis were within 20 miles of Damascus

If only they'd finished the job when they had the chance ..... :(

8 posted on 10/07/2003 12:29:44 AM PDT by Brandon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: the_greatest_country_ever
Ultimately, Mrs. Meir's nuclear legacy goes far beyond those days in October 1973. Her prudence contributed significantly to the creation of the nuclear taboo — the recognition that nuclear weapons are not like any other weapons humanity has ever invented; that under virtually any circumstances they must never be used.

I don't see anything in this article that indicates nukes wouldn't have been used had the US not thown a massive amount of air support to Israel.

9 posted on 10/07/2003 12:35:21 AM PDT by Timesink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: the_greatest_country_ever
"...it demonstrated to the world that Israel was a responsible and trusted nuclear custodian"

Yep,which is why it really gripes my cookies when I hear people constantly whining about how Israel,America etc have WMDs so why pick on Iraq?

Sooner or later people who are not "a responsible and trusted nuclear custodian" will have a nuclear weapon and will use it at the earliest available opportunity on those same folks.

"Like John F. Kennedy a decade earlier, Golda Meir had stared into the nuclear abyss and found a path back to sanity"

No doubt there are certain folks who would stare into the nuclear abyss and grin from ear to ear.It seems only a matter of time before we have more "nuclear moments".

good read,thanks

God bless

10 posted on 10/07/2003 3:26:43 AM PDT by mitch5501 (by the grace of God,I am what I am)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Timesink
"I don't see anything in this article that indicates nukes wouldn't have been used had the US not thown a massive amount of air support to Israel."

I'm not sure you were meant to.The point I think is that they were willing to try whatever it took in order not to use them.I expect that they probably would have used them had not American support been forthcoming.

There are some folks who would actively pursue the option of using a nuclear weapon regardless of what other options they had.It would be their first choice.

11 posted on 10/07/2003 3:32:12 AM PDT by mitch5501 (by the grace of God,I am what I am)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: the_greatest_country_ever
Wrong ! In 1999 alone there were at least three such moments. Ans they were not the last ones.
12 posted on 10/07/2003 4:05:55 AM PDT by Truth666
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: the_greatest_country_ever
>>The shock Israelis felt at the Egyptian-Syrian surprise attack on Oct. 6, 1973, can best be compared to that felt by Americans after the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor.

That would be a very poor analogy. Americans in St. Louis weren't in any danger of being overrun by the Japanese is a week or two. Isrealis in Tel Aviv faced a real possibility of being overrun by Arab armies.

I would expect that the Israelis felt a much more serious shock.
13 posted on 10/07/2003 4:41:07 AM PDT by FreedomPoster (In for the monthly deal since 3 quarterlies ago - support Free Republic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: the_greatest_country_ever
Events of the Yom Kippur War were very dangerous not just in Israel -- the overseas Naval base I worked at went on a very high state of alert when the airlift kicked in...

The airlift was primarily supplied from NATO stocks since these were the closest, and there was great fear that the Soviets would take advantage of NATO's depleted tanks, ammo and other things to expand a war which they no doubt had a hand in since Egypt and Syria were Soviet clients...

14 posted on 10/07/2003 4:53:22 AM PDT by chilepepper (The map is not the territory -- Alfred Korzybski)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brandon
agree
15 posted on 10/07/2003 5:29:04 AM PDT by jonalvy44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: the_greatest_country_ever; veronica; dennisw
<< By Oct. 21 the Israelis were within 20 miles of Damascus and had crossed the Suez Canal, encircling the Egyptian Third Army. >>

An extraordinary time for me. From mid-September though late October 1973 I was "working" in Cairo and only after the cease-fire was negotiated went by train to Khartoum, where I found much of the Egyptian air farce parked in rows at the airport waiting out any risk of having to face combat.

Too bad the Big General didn't annihilate the Egyptian Third Army AND nuke Damascus, Cairo and Amman.

Like the Chinese when a handful of Englishmen in a few wooden ships at the end of a ten thousand miles and six months long line of supply and communications totally defeated them in what Peking's self-appointed mass murderers like to call the "opium wars" -- and sulk about still -- and the Japanese at the end of the second world war, the Arabs would have experienced the total defeat and total humiliation they will need if the personality changes witnessed in the nineteenth century's whipped Chinese and the twentieth century's arse-whipped and wiped-up Japanese are ever to occur among the islamofascists!

Bump/Ping/Ping
16 posted on 10/07/2003 6:11:39 AM PDT by Brian Allen ( Rebellion to tyrants is obedience to God - Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brandon
<< the_greatest_country_ever


By Oct. 21 the Israelis were within 20 miles of Damascus

If only they'd finished the job when they had the chance ..... :( >>

Even though, because of where I was required to be that month, I might have been vaporized, I 100% agree.

[See #16]

The fat lady will not and cannot sing until we have inflicted both total defeat and abject humiliation upon the hesperophobically-islamofascistic Arabs.
17 posted on 10/07/2003 6:18:16 AM PDT by Brian Allen ( Rebellion to tyrants is obedience to God - Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: the_greatest_country_ever
It was even closer than that. In a story I've never seen in print, the Pershing units of the 56th Brigade in Germany received incorrect orders and went to the field with live ammo and were ready to mate warheads when someone realized the mistake.

This is the only time this ever happened, and the only time live rounds were issued other then on our hard sites. It was very strange being in the German woods wondering what was going on in the middle east.

18 posted on 10/07/2003 6:20:46 AM PDT by HoustonCurmudgeon (PEACE - Through Superior Firepower)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Southack
The writer does not mention how close the U.S. and the U.S.S.R. came to going at each other during the Yom Kippur War. The USSR had set in motion its plans to intercede militarily on behalf of its close ally, Syria. Nixon found out about it, and told Breszhnev that if Soviet troops joined the fray, the U.S. would strike Soviet targets. Our military, especially the Air Force (of which I was a member at the time) went on high alert, and we put a hell of a lot of B-52s and F-111s in the air, and scrambled our strategic forces. The Soviets had second thoughts, and decided to sit this one out.
19 posted on 10/07/2003 6:30:31 AM PDT by ought-six
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: the_greatest_country_ever
I recall there was another close shave in the 1967 war when the Israelis were doing their usual number of kicking Arab butt. The Soviets were just freaked at how badly their client Nasser had been creamed, and were in such a state of shock to the point of thinking about taking out Israel themselves. The Washington-Moscow hotline got a workout on that one.
20 posted on 10/07/2003 6:36:03 AM PDT by chimera
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson