To: SoothingDave
Are you saying all unproven allegations, which result in no punishment, should follow a priest around forever?Not at all. But, given the present circumstances, no priest should invite one of his buddies into a diocese without informing the bishop of that diocese.
No one can be taken at their word, any longer.
13 posted on
07/01/2004 7:39:45 AM PDT by
sinkspur
(There's no problem on the inside of a kid that the outside of a dog can't cure.)
To: sinkspur
given the present circumstances, no priest should invite one of his buddies into a diocese without informing the bishop of that diocese. Oh, I didn't realize the bishop was not informed. You're right, no priest should just hang around without the bishop knowing.
SD
To: sinkspur
Not at all. But, given the present circumstances, no priest should invite one of his buddies into a diocese without informing the bishop of that diocese.On another thread you railed at Bps. like Bruskewitz, who exerted "control" of their Dioceses.
Perhaps this post of yours is your concession that such "control" is necessary?
29 posted on
07/01/2004 12:08:46 PM PDT by
ninenot
(Minister of Membership, TomasTorquemadaGentlemen'sClub)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson