So what do we have? Faulty notions of God and love. A miracle shrouded in doubt. A process put on fast-track by a Pope who has himself championed the wrong notion of theological pluralism. This concept implies admittance that there is not just one Revelation and one uniform interpretation of it, as the Catholic Church has always taught, but that the revelations and false interpretations of other religions would also be correct.
It certainly leads one to seriously suspect that the intention of John Paul II was not just to beatify a person, in this case, Mother Teresa, but to canonize the post-Conciliar progressivist thinking on ecumenism and universal salvation that she adhered to.
This beatification also raises suspicions about others, such as that of John XXIII, whose incorrupt body was demonstrated to be preserved by scientific means, and who always supported the Modernist errors. One cant help but wonder what has happened: Has the Catholic Faith changed, or does a person no longer need to profess it to be beatified?
*Maid Marian is a heretical schismatic who uses her time to trash the Magisterium.
Her buddy in arms, Atila Guimaeres is worse
Atila Sinke Guimarães
THE CANONIZATION OF WOJTYLA, THE MORAL-FREE POPE - One of the first declarations of Pope Ratzinger was that Karol Wojtyla would be set on a fast track toward canonization. On May 13, Ratzinger announced he had dispensed with rules that normally impose a five-year waiting period before beatification can even start. Actually, he was just repeating what he had already stated before he was chosen Pontiff on the eve of the conclave.
Given the favorable hullabaloo that the media raised over the death of John Paul II, Ratzingers comment on the eve of the conclave about speeding up the process of JPII can easily be seen as a smart campaign maneuver to attain the papacy. His later announcement of a new track for sainthood especially designed for Wojtyla can also be understood as a way to make himself appear more appealing to public opinion, which has never found him so. He places himself under the umbrella of Wojtyla's popularity.
So, regarding politics and tactics, Ratzinger has acted, and continues to act, as a politician persuing his own interest. Machiavelli would have advised the same thing. This kind of divinization of close friends or relatives for political advantages was not rare in the decadent Roman Empire. For example, the emperor Caracalla made his brother Geta, whom he had murdered, a god.
...
It is my opinion that the infallibility linked to the previous processes also vanished. I think that no one is obliged to believe that all these new saints and blesseds are really such.
...
In fact, the selection of saints that pleased Wojtyla was far from being perfect. He decreed that modernists like Frederic Ozanan and Angelo Roncalli be raised to the glory of the altars. He championed existentialists like Edith Stein and religious indifferentists like Mother Teresa, along with others whose orthodoxy of thought and heroic practice of virtues are widely open to discussion.
* Horvat and Guimaeres are hateful schismatics who spread enmity and division.
Are they Traditional Catholics?
Please...