Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The real George Washington?
The Washington Times ^ | December 17, 2006 | GARY SCOTT SMITH

Posted on 12/17/2006 11:22:59 AM PST by Alex Murphy

Even before he died in December 1799, a battle began over the nature and significance of George Washington's faith. Was the father of our country a deist, a Unitarian, a lukewarm Christian, or a fervent evangelical?

Popular paintings depict Washington praying in the snow at Valley Forge during the Revolutionary War and ascending to heaven after his death. Few of the varied aspects of the Virginian's life have caused as much contention as his religious beliefs and habits. Moreover, no other president has had his religious life so distorted by folklore.

Given Washington's immense contributions to the American republic, semi-divine status, and importance to American civil religion, this intense debate is not surprising. Moreover, Washington is an important figure in a second heated dispute over whether the United States was founded as a Christian nation.

After his death, Washington was elevated to sainthood and portrayed as God's instrument. In life and death, he has been seen as "the deliverer of America," the American Moses, and even a demigod. In their funeral sermons, Federalist clergy effusively praised Washington as a devout Christian who liberated God's chosen people from British oppression. A spate of books published in the 19th century to promote Washington's piety feature stories of him arranging Communion services before battles, retreating into the woods during military encampments to pray, and inspiring country churches by his zealous worship.

Three new books have recently joined this debate. In "Moral Minority: Our Skeptical Founding Fathers," Brooke Allen concludes Washington was probably a deist. She argues that in his extensive correspondence Washington rarely mentioned Christianity and never mentioned "a Savior or Redeemer." Unlike Thomas Jefferson and Benjamin Franklin, Washington did not even refer to Jesus as a great moral teacher.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...


TOPICS: History; Mainline Protestant; Religion & Politics; Skeptics/Seekers
KEYWORDS: christianity; deism; georgewashington; washington
From later in the article:

...the major objections to Washington being a Christian: he never took Communion after the Revolutionary War began; he stood rather than knelt during prayers; "he refused to declare his specific beliefs" publicly; he very rarely mentioned Jesus in public or in private correspondence or the Christian names for God; "his death seemed more Stoic than Christian"; and "his view of Providence" seemed similar to the Greek or Roman view of fate.

1 posted on 12/17/2006 11:23:01 AM PST by Alex Murphy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Alex Murphy

According to some politically correct history being taught in schools nowadays, George Washington owned slaves. His role in the Revolution and being our 1st president is inconsequential according to some. His owning slaves overrides everything else.

In New Orleans a few years ago, they changed the name of George Washington school to honor some African royalty, based on this politically correct theory that if one had owned slaves, one is historically worthless.

There's also an effort in Berkeley to change the name of Thomas Jefferson school, for the same reason, that Jefferson owned slaves, thus Jefferson must be evil and worthless also.


2 posted on 12/17/2006 11:28:26 AM PST by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alex Murphy

If Jesus himself were a Founding Father, there are people who would try to claim he was nonreligious.


3 posted on 12/17/2006 11:30:01 AM PST by WinOne4TheGipper (Consult your doctor before taking tagline. Do not take tagline with alcohol.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WinOne4TheGipper

or they might claim that he was changing the religion, after all he was Jewish. They would probably attack him for making changes or trying to start a false religion.


4 posted on 12/17/2006 11:36:11 AM PST by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Alex Murphy

Was George Washington a Christian?

by David Barton

This is a question often asked today, and it arises from the efforts of those who seek to impeach Washington's character by portraying him as irreligious. Interestingly, Washington's own contemporaries did not question his Christianity but were thoroughly convinced of his devout faith--a fact made evident in the first-ever compilation of the The Writings of George Washington, published in the 1830s.

That compilation of Washington's writings was prepared and published by Jared Sparks (1789-1866), a noted writer and historian. Sparks' herculean historical productions included not only the writings of George Washington (12 volumes) but also Benjamin Franklin (10 volumes) and Constitution signer Gouverneur Morris (3 volumes). Additionally, Sparks compiled the Library of American Biography (25 volumes), The Diplomatic Correspondence of the American Revolution (12 volumes), and the Correspondence of the American Revolution (4 volumes). In all, Sparks was responsible for some 100 historical volumes. Additionally, Sparks was America's first professor of history--other than ecclesiastical history--to teach at the college level in the United States, and he was later chosen president of Harvard.

Jared Sparks' decision to compile George Washington's works is described by The Dictionary of American Biography. It details that Sparks began . . .

. . . what was destined to be his greatest life work, the publication of the writings of George Washington. [Supreme Court] Justice Bushrod Washington, [the nephew of George Washington, the executor of the Washington estate, and] the owner of the Washington manuscripts, was won over by an offer to share the profits, through the friendly mediation of Chief Justice [of the Supreme Court, John] Marshall [who from 1804-1807 had written a popular five volume biography of George Washington], who also consented to take an equal share, twenty-five per cent, with the owner. In January 1827, Sparks found himself alone at Mount Vernon with the manuscripts. An examination of them extending over three months showed that years would be required for the undertaking; and with the owner's consent, Sparks carried off the entire collection, eight large boxes, picking up on the way to Boston a box of diplomatic correspondence from the Department of State, and the [General Horatio] Gates manuscripts from the New York Historical Society. Not content with these, he searched or caused to be searched public and private archives for material, questioned survivors of the Revolution, visited and mapped historic sites. In 1830, for instance, he followed [Benedict] Arnold's [1775] route to Quebec. The first of the twelve volumes of The Writings of George Washington to be published (vol. II) appeared in 1834 and the last (vol. I, containing the biography) in 1837.

In Volume XII of these writings, Jared Sparks delved into the religious character of George Washington, and included numerous letters written by the friends, associates, and family of Washington which testified of his religious character. Based on that extensive evidence, Sparks concluded:

To say that he [George Washington] was not a Christian would be to impeach his sincerity and honesty. Of all men in the world, Washington was certainly the last whom any one would charge with dissimulation or indirectness [hypocrisies and evasiveness]; and if he was so scrupulous in avoiding even a shadow of these faults in every known act of his life, [regardless of] however unimportant, is it likely, is it credible, that in a matter of the highest and most serious importance [his religious faith, that] he should practice through a long series of years a deliberate deception upon his friends and the public? It is neither credible nor possible.

One of the letters Sparks used to arrive at his conclusion was from Nelly Custis-Lewis. While Nelly technically was the granddaughter of the Washingtons, in reality she was much more.

When Martha [Custis] married George, she was a widow and brought two young children (John and Martha--also called Patsy) from her first marriage into her marriage with George. The two were carefully raised by George and Martha, later married, and each had children of their own. Unfortunately, tragedy struck, and both John and Patsy died early (by 1781). John left behind his widow and four young children ranging in age from infancy to six years old.

At the time, Washington was still deeply involved in guiding the American Revolution and tried unsuccessfully to convince Martha's brother to raise the children. The young widow of John was unable to raise all four, so George and Martha adopted the two younger children: Nelly Parke Custis and George Washington Parke Custis, both of whom already were living at Mount Vernon.

Nelly lived with the Washingtons for twenty years, from the time of her birth in 1779 until 1799, the year of her marriage and of George Washington's untimely death. She called George and Martha her "beloved parents whom I loved with so much devotion, to whose unceasing tenderness I was indebted for every good I possessed."

Nelly was ten years old when Washington was called to the Presidency, and she grew to maturity during his two terms. During that time, she traveled with Washington and walked amidst the great foreign and domestic names of the day. On Washington's retirement, she returned with the family to Mount Vernon. Nelly was energetic, spry, and lively, and was the joy of George Washington's life. She served as a gracious hostess and entertained the frequent guests to Mount Vernon who visited the former President.

On Washington's birthday in 1799, Nelly married Washington's private secretary, Lawrence Lewis. They spent several months on an extended honeymoon, visiting friends and family across the country. On their return to Mount Vernon, she was pregnant and late that year gave birth to a daughter. A short few weeks later, on December 14, General Washington was taken seriously ill and died.

Clearly, Nelly was someone who knew the private and public life of her "father" very well. Therefore, Jared Sparks, in searching for information on Washington's religious habits, dispatched a letter to Nelly, asking if she knew for sure whether George Washington indeed was a Christian. Within a week, she had replied to Sparks, and Sparks included her letter in Volume XII of Washington's writings in the lengthy section on Washington's religious habits. Of that specific letter, Jared Sparks explained:

I shall here insert a letter on this subject, written to me by a lady who lived twenty years in Washington's family and who was his adopted daughter, and the granddaughter of Mrs. Washington. The testimony it affords, and the hints it contains respecting the domestic habits of Washington, are interesting and valuable."

Woodlawn, 26 February, 1833.

Sir,

I received your favor of the 20th instant last evening, and hasten to give you the information, which you desire.

Truro [Episcopal] Parish is the one in which Mount Vernon, Pohick Church [the church where George Washington served as a vestryman], and Woodlawn [the home of Nelly and Lawrence Lewis] are situated. Fairfax Parish is now Alexandria. Before the Federal District was ceded to Congress, Alexandria was in Fairfax County. General Washington had a pew in Pohick Church, and one in Christ Church at Alexandria. He was very instrumental in establishing Pohick Church, and I believe subscribed [supported and contributed to] largely. His pew was near the pulpit. I have a perfect recollection of being there, before his election to the presidency, with him and my grandmother. It was a beautiful church, and had a large, respectable, and wealthy congregation, who were regular attendants.

He attended the church at Alexandria when the weather and roads permitted a ride of ten miles [a one-way journey of 2-3 hours by horse or carriage]. In New York and Philadelphia he never omitted attendance at church in the morning, unless detained by indisposition [sickness]. The afternoon was spent in his own room at home; the evening with his family, and without company. Sometimes an old and intimate friend called to see us for an hour or two; but visiting and visitors were prohibited for that day [Sunday]. No one in church attended to the services with more reverential respect. My grandmother, who was eminently pious, never deviated from her early habits. She always knelt. The General, as was then the custom, stood during the devotional parts of the service. On communion Sundays, he left the church with me, after the blessing, and returned home, and we sent the carriage back for my grandmother.

It was his custom to retire to his library at nine or ten o'clock where he remained an hour before he went to his chamber. He always rose before the sun and remained in his library until called to breakfast. I never witnessed his private devotions. I never inquired about them. I should have thought it the greatest heresy to doubt his firm belief in Christianity. His life, his writings, prove that he was a Christian. He was not one of those who act or pray, "that they may be seen of men" [Matthew 6:5]. He communed with his God in secret [Matthew 6:6].

My mother [Eleanor Calvert-Lewis] resided two years at Mount Vernon after her marriage [in 1774] with John Parke Custis, the only son of Mrs. Washington. I have heard her say that General Washington always received the sacrament with my grandmother before the revolution. When my aunt, Miss Custis [Martha's daughter] died suddenly at Mount Vernon, before they could realize the event [before they understood she was dead], he [General Washington] knelt by her and prayed most fervently, most affectingly, for her recovery. Of this I was assured by Judge [Bushrod] Washington's mother and other witnesses.

He was a silent, thoughtful man. He spoke little generally; never of himself. I never heard him relate a single act of his life during the war. I have often seen him perfectly abstracted, his lips moving, but no sound was perceptible. I have sometimes made him laugh most heartily from sympathy with my joyous and extravagant spirits. I was, probably, one of the last persons on earth to whom he would have addressed serious conversation, particularly when he knew that I had the most perfect model of female excellence [Martha Washington] ever with me as my monitress, who acted the part of a tender and devoted parent, loving me as only a mother can love, and never extenuating [tolerating] or approving in me what she disapproved of others. She never omitted her private devotions, or her public duties; and she and her husband were so perfectly united and happy that he must have been a Christian. She had no doubts, no fears for him. After forty years of devoted affection and uninterrupted happiness, she resigned him without a murmur into the arms of his Savior and his God, with the assured hope of his eternal felicity [happiness in Heaven]. Is it necessary that any one should certify, "General Washington avowed himself to me a believer in Christianity?" As well may we question his patriotism, his heroic, disinterested devotion to his country. His mottos were, "Deeds, not Words"; and, "For God and my Country."

With sentiments of esteem,

I am, Nelly Custis-Lewis

George Washington's adopted daughter, having spent twenty years of her life in his presence, declared that one might as well question Washington's patriotism as question his Christianity. Certainly, no one questions his patriotism; so is it not rather ridiculous to question his Christianity? George Washington was a devout Episcopalian; and although as an Episcopalian he would not be classified as an outspoken and extrovert "evangelical" Founder as were Founding Fathers like Benjamin Rush, Roger Sherman, and Thomas McKean, nevertheless, being an Episcopalian makes George Washington no less of a Christian. Yet for the current revisionists who have made it their goal to assert that America was founded as a secular nation by secular individuals and that the only hope for America's longevity rests in her continued secularism, George Washington's faith must be sacrificed on the altar of their secularist agenda.

For much more on George Washington and the evidences of his strong faith, examine the following sources:

* George Washington, The Writings of George Washington, Jared Sparks, editor (Boston: Ferdinand Andrews, Publisher, 1838), Vol. XII, pp. 399-411.
* George Washington, The Religious Opinions of Washington, E. C. M'Guire, editor (New York: Harper & Brothers, 1836).
* William Johnson, George Washington The Christian (1917).
* William Jackson Johnstone, How Washington Prayed (New York: The Abingdon Press, 1932).
* The Messages and Papers of the Presidents
* , James D. Richardson, editor (Published by the Authority of Congress, 1899), Vol. I, pp. 51-57 (1789), 64 (1789), 213-224 (1796), etc. George Washington, Address of George Washington, President of the United States, Late Commander in Chief of the American Army, to the People of the United States, Preparatory to his Declination (Baltimore: George & Henry S. Keatinge, 1796), pp. 22-23.
* George Washington, The Maxims of Washington (New York: D. Appleton and Co., 1855).


5 posted on 12/17/2006 11:41:41 AM PST by LiteKeeper (Beware the secularization of America; the Islamization of Eurabia)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alex Murphy
..."his death seemed more Stoic than Christian"...

I can't recall his name, but I did hear one of Washington's biographers
say that while there was no death-bed appeals/statements of a religious manner,
this COULD be considered consistent with contemporary concepts of "honor".

In other words, an ideal of the time was that a "gentleman" usually managed
all his affairs and was usually reserved in comportment.
Thus, a fellow like Washington might even have considered it
"beneath him" to make emotive proclamations while enduring his
final hours.
As a gentleman of the time, he had taken care to be on a good footing
with his Creator and thus wouldn't be making loud pronouncements
as he slipped into eternity.

Well, that's one historian's speculation on the topic.
6 posted on 12/17/2006 11:54:43 AM PST by VOA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy
Are they trying to assasinate the first President?
7 posted on 12/17/2006 12:18:33 PM PST by NonValueAdded (Prayers for our patriot brother, 68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub, now more than ever my FRiends.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert San Diego
According to some politically correct history being taught in schools nowadays, George Washington owned slaves.

Well, in point of fact, Washington did own slaves. There's no doubt about that. I think what you mean is that some people might want to define him solely by his owning slaves.

I don't understand the point of this article. No matter what the personal religious beliefs of the Founding Fathers, there can be no doubt that they wanted a nation that was officially neutral on the subject of religion, not taking any sides. They had ample opportunity to enshrine one faith into law and refused to do so at every turn.

Wahsington's religious beliefs are interesting to those who want to learn more about the man but not terribly relevant when discussing the nation the Founders created for us.

8 posted on 12/17/2006 12:36:39 PM PST by highball ("I never should have switched from scotch to martinis." -- the last words of Humphrey Bogart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: highball
"Wahsington's religious beliefs are interesting to those who want to learn more about the man but not terribly relevant when discussing the nation the Founders created for us."

When you get time you may want to click my screen name and scroll about 1/2 way down the page to the "Emory Report", and beyond.

9 posted on 12/17/2006 1:57:27 PM PST by Matchett-PI (To have no voice in the Party that always sides with America's enemies is a badge of honor.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Alex Murphy; Dilbert San Diego; WinOne4TheGipper; LiteKeeper; VOA; NonValueAdded; highball; ...
A slightly off-subject tale of George Washington that I ran across several months ago. I think you'll find it interesting. If you already know this story, my apologies for the ping.

An Indian chief, who tried hard to kill him, believed Washington was "a particular favorite of heaven; a man who could never die in battle."

link

10 posted on 12/17/2006 6:42:22 PM PST by labette (Through Him all things were made; without Him nothing was made ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: highball

So long as we don't confuse the understanding of religious neutrality as James Madison understood it and the ACLU's Jacobin understanding as an enmity between state and church and a refusal to defer to the Christian religious heritage of its people. In any case, far more Americans were affected by the enthusiasm of the Great Awakening than by the logic of the Scottish Enlightenment, which Jefferson et al. found so persuasive. But it was not logic but observation that led Jefferson and Madison, and before them Patrick Henry, to support relgious liberty in the Commonwealth. The witness of unlettered Baptist preachers who dared to defy the establishment and were whippedf for it, aroused a sense of outrage even in their cool minds. When the Revolution came, New Light preachers of all sects supported the Revolution, much as their likes had supported Cromwell more thna hundred years before.


11 posted on 12/17/2006 7:03:28 PM PST by RobbyS ( CHI)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Alex Murphy

It might also be noted that Washington, together with John Adams, attended a Catholic vesper service on Sunday afternoon, October 9, 1774, while they were in Philadelphia as fellow delegates to the Continental Congress.


12 posted on 12/18/2006 9:08:18 AM PST by Savonarola
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RobbyS
The witness of unlettered Baptist preachers who dared to defy
the establishment and were whippedf for it, aroused a sense of outrage
even in their cool minds.


The idea of Baptist being an oppressed/persecuted group, especially to
folks in The South, sounds sort of crazy.

Thanks to our current "history teachers", people haven't a clue
about what it was to be a Baptist in early New England.
13 posted on 12/18/2006 10:52:15 AM PST by VOA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson