Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: adiaireton8

I think, and the Church has traditionally taught, that the “sin” isn’t being homosexual, it is engaging in homosexual acts.


16 posted on 05/19/2008 3:41:46 PM PDT by cammie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: cammie
I think, and the Church has traditionally taught, that the “sin” isn’t being homosexual, it is engaging in homosexual acts.

The inherent orientation, strictly in itself, is not sinful if the individual had no part in its creation. Any conative thought processes, however, including fantasies that are under the individual's control, may be sinful. The thoughts need not be acted upon. This goes for heterosexuals and adulterous fantasies, etc., as well.

19 posted on 05/19/2008 3:51:12 PM PDT by steve86 (Acerbic by nature, not nurture™)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: cammie

We do teach that, but it has been decided that homosexuality is a disordered condition, and is not what is needed in the priesthood. Remember, part of the mission of the priest is to form and shape his congregation, and we don’t need homos shaping the CYO.


25 posted on 05/19/2008 5:42:25 PM PDT by ichabod1 (If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it, and if it stops moving, subsidize it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: cammie
I think, and the Church has traditionally taught, that the “sin” isn’t being homosexual, it is engaging in homosexual acts.

Real simple, Cammie.

Homosexual act= sinful

Homosexual orientation = not sinful but intrinsically disordered.

33 posted on 05/20/2008 6:49:15 AM PDT by marshmallow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson