To: RaceBannon
15 posted on
02/18/2009 3:51:44 PM PST by
Soothesayer
(The United States of America Rest in Peace November 4 2008)
To: Soothesayer
Show me where Genesis 1 and 2 differ
38 posted on
02/18/2009 4:57:26 PM PST by
RaceBannon
(We have sown the wind, but we will reap the whirlwind. NObama. Not my president.)
To: Soothesayer
Before I reply directly to your post I want to put all of my cards on the table.
First of all, I am a 'young earther' but I am no scientist. So, if I'm asked to back up my belief with scientific evidence, I will be at a loss on this forum. I've learned through experience that I am not at anywhere near the level of learning of others on this forum to ever hold my own on this issue. Not that other young earth creationists aren't able to argue sufficiently, I'm just not.
That being said, I have no problem with old earth creationists. I don't agree, but it is neither here nor there on the subject of salvation. New earth or old earth adherence need not have any effect on how one views God's Grace. The only time I have a problem is when someone tries to stuff God into a purely naturalist 'box.' That is impossible to do with consistency without having an effect on how one views God's saving Grace.
Now, that that's out of the way... my response to your reply:
Which? Genesis 1 or 2?
The Documentary Hypothesis is bunk.
48 posted on
02/18/2009 5:10:24 PM PST by
raynearhood
("I consider looseness with words no less of a defect than looseness of the bowels" -John Calvin)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson