Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

ADDRESS OF THE PEERS OF ENGLAND TO POPE CLEMENT VII
ASKING FOR THE ANNULMENT OF KING HENRY VIII’S MARRIAGE
[ex Anglia], 1530 July 13th


    Parchment, mm 950x458; open envelope on which (dark red) ribbons are sewn, bearing 85 seals of just as many signers of the document. The seals, in red wax, nearly all navette-shaped, are contained in tin caskets. 

   ASV, A. A., Arm. I‑XVIII, 4098 A (XC); detail of the seals (XCI)

   Whatever the remote cause of the Anglican schism, there is no doubt that the most immediate and determining cause was Henry VIII’s (1509-1547) wish to get rid of his legitimate wife, Catherine of Aragon, daughter of Ferdinand and Isabella of Spain and aunt of the future emperor Charles V, in order to get married with Anne Boleyn, lady-in-waiting, who wanted to belong to him only as a wife. The sovereign did not hide his intentions and was ready to take any decision in order to achieve his aim. In fact, in 1527, Henry VIII undertook some initiatives with the local archbishops and with the papal legate, Cardinal Wolsey, so that the cause of nullity of the sovereign’s marriage with Catherine of Aragon (who had given birth to 6 children, of whom only Mary Tudor survived) was dealt with in England, where it was easy for the King to exercise his pressure. This was by no means allowed by the Pontiff, who moved the trial of the case to Rome.

   Due to the delicate implications the case implied, both for its juridical nature and for the ecclesiastic policy, Clement VII took time before pronouncing a sentence. And during this difficult situation the King and his ministers never ceased to put pressure on Rome, so that the issue could be quickly resolved. Also the Peers of England, all together, acted in favour of the sovereign and with the present document – in an intentionally solemn form – in 1530 asked the Pope to put an end to their long wait and to that of the entire English Nation.

    Their request has an urging nature, and is definitely not a plea for the annulment, which they take for granted, considering the favourable opinion already given by the English, French and Italian scholars, as well as the benevolence always shown by the King towards the Holy See (from line 5: Sufficere sane alioquin debuisset causae ipsius iusticia eruditissimorum virorum calculis passim probata celeberimarum academiarum suffragiis iudicata ab Anglis, a Gallis, ab Italis prout quisque apud eos ceteros eruditione antecellit pronunciata et diffinita ut Sanctitas Vestra, etiam nemine petente et reclamantibus quibuscumque, suo ore suaque auctoritate aliorum sentencias confirmaret, presertim cum causae diffinicio eum regem, illud regnum respiciat, quod de Sede illa Apostolica tam multis nominibus benemeritum sit). At the end of the text, the Peers declare their intention to agree with the Pontiff whatever his sentence may be (third last line: Interim vero Deum Optimum Maximum, quem ipsam esse veritatem certissimo testimonio cognoscimus, comprecabimur, ut Sanctitatis Vestre consilia ita informare atque dirigere dignetur, ut quod sanctum, iustum ac verum est a Vestre Sanctitatis auctoritate obtinentes, ab omni alia assequende veritatis molestia liberemur). It is well-know that the Pope then declared legitimate Henry VIII’s marriage with Catherine of Aragon, and therefore indissoluble, and how the sovereign, hindered from carrying out his plans, got married again and declared the separation of the Church of England from the Church of Rome (the Anglican schism).

Source: Vatican Secret Archives


1 posted on 05/13/2009 8:49:13 AM PDT by markomalley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: sionnsar; Huber; NYer; Salvation

ping for your lists


2 posted on 05/13/2009 8:50:15 AM PDT by markomalley (Extra Ecclesiam nulla salus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: markomalley

bfltr


3 posted on 05/13/2009 8:50:32 AM PDT by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: markomalley
declared the separation of the Church of England from the Church of Rome

I don't know who's commentary this is, but this is incorrect. Neither Henry nor the bishops ever declared any such thing as "the Church of England."

Perhaps in the grand scheme of things it doesn't make much difference, but in the name of truth, it's worth noting.

4 posted on 05/13/2009 9:04:18 AM PDT by trad_anglican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: markomalley
. . . includes the seals of dozens of peers of England who concurred with the request.

Considering Henry VII's warm personality, I'm sure they all just lined up to give their seals.

5 posted on 05/13/2009 9:05:47 AM PDT by Vigilanteman (Are there any men left in Washington? Or, are there only cowards? Ahmad Shah Massoud)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: markomalley

He should have been a US Senator like the swimmer; he bought his annulment for a few Shekels. I am still waiting for him to see Mary Jo again. The disgusting murder and with the Church can make his children bastards.

Disgusting waste of a human being. Only the democraps can cheer and worship him as the Lion of the Senate. Yes, the cowardly lion. Are we in Kansas yet??

Is there a pattern in the Democrap world of hero that I don’t understand? It seems that the party of corruption is the Democraps. Tax Evasion, Murtha, Reid, murders, lying majority leaders, and the list goes on from local elected officials all of the way to the illegal Alien President we have currently sitting in 1600 Penn Ave. I’m from NJ and according to a recent FBI report, my state is more corrupt than Ill.


6 posted on 05/13/2009 9:16:01 AM PDT by noname07718 (Freedom is never more than one generation from extinction-Ronald Reagan 1993)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: markomalley

This annulment was not an unusual request for the wealthy and powerful back then (or today). What was unusual was that Rome didn’t grant it.


8 posted on 05/13/2009 9:28:36 AM PDT by bobjam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: markomalley

bumpus ad summum


15 posted on 05/13/2009 8:14:16 PM PDT by Dajjal (Obama is an Ericksonian NLP hypnotist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson