Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

British court rules chief rabbi’s definition of a Jew is discriminatory
Catholic Culture ^ | November 12, 2009

Posted on 11/12/2009 11:38:43 AM PST by Pope Pius XII

A British appeals court has ruled that a Jewish school unlawfully discriminated against an applicant who was not a Jew according to the British chief rabbi’s definition of Judaism. The applicant is the son of a Jewish father and a mother who converted at a Reformed synagogue; according to Chief Rabbi Jonathan Sacks, a child of a mother who converted to Judaism is Jewish only if the mother converted at an Orthodox synagogue.

Whether this definition of Judaism is “benign or malignant, theological or supremacist … the requirement that if a pupil is to qualify for admission his mother must be Jewish, whether by descent or conversion, is a test of ethnicity which contravenes the Race Relations Act,” the court ruled.


TOPICS: Religion & Culture; Religion & Politics
KEYWORDS: governmentreligion; jewish; jews; judaism
Oh brother, not this again.
1 posted on 11/12/2009 11:38:44 AM PST by Pope Pius XII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Pope Pius XII
the requirement that if a pupil is to qualify for admission his mother must be Jewish, whether by descent or conversion, is a test of ethnicity which contravenes the Race Relations Act

So Islamic Swine must be admitted too?

ML/NJ

2 posted on 11/12/2009 11:45:14 AM PST by ml/nj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ml/nj

Don’t think this can’t happen to the Catholic Church when a court decides that the Church is being “discriminatory” in defining who’s Catholic and who isn’t.


3 posted on 11/12/2009 11:48:04 AM PST by Pope Pius XII (There's no such thing as divorce)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Pope Pius XII
British appeals court

Cretins.

4 posted on 11/12/2009 12:14:29 PM PST by annalex (http://www.catecheticsonline.com/CatenaAurea.php)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pope Pius XII

From the NYT link: “Britain has nearly 7,000 publicly financed religious schools, representing Judaism as well as the Church of England, Catholicism and Islam, among others. Under a 2006 law, the schools can in busy years give preference to applicants within their own faiths, using criteria laid down by a designated religious authority.”

So it is a publicly funded school, but the 2006 law appeared to allow them to set criteria. Or not, obviously. Note to religious schools: Avoid public money at all costs.


5 posted on 11/12/2009 12:15:06 PM PST by greatplains
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: greatplains

No kidding. Accept public funding, accept public control.


6 posted on 11/12/2009 12:42:28 PM PST by cizinec
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson