To: Cronos
I suggest you try one of the official sites first. I’ve found that to be a good practice. Then get back to me.
15 posted on
09/17/2011 2:02:18 AM PDT by
count-your-change
(You don't have be brilliant, not being stupid is enough.)
To: count-your-change; Bitsy; NorthStarStateConservative
oh, I've seen them. The Jehovah's witnesses do seem incredibly cultic. After all, they have purposely in the 1800s and 1900s distorted the bible for their own nefarious purpose.
Come on, cyc, how can you believe this crazy Jehovah's Witness distorted philosophy?
19 posted on
09/17/2011 11:50:14 PM PDT by
Cronos
(www.forfiter.com)
To: count-your-change; Bitsy; NorthStarStateConservative; MarkBsnr; Natural Law; WPaCon; Mad Dawg; ...
cyc:
As with abortion due to medical necessity transfusion of blood for medical necessity is a term proving obsolete. Comparing blood transfusions to abortion is a false linkage. That's a false Jehovah's Witness linkage.
blood transfusion is needed at times -- do you seriously wish to argue that it is not? What kind of WatchTower issue tries to argue this?
20 posted on
09/17/2011 11:55:15 PM PDT by
Cronos
(www.forfiter.com)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson