Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Franky Schaeffer Derides Christianity as “Stupid”
Institute on Religion and Democracy ^ | 10/07/2011 | Kristin Rudolph

Posted on 10/07/2011 1:10:41 PM PDT by SeekAndFind

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101 next last
To: SeekAndFind
Franky Schaeffer . . . discussed his newest book Sex, Mom, and God: How the Bible's Strange Take on Sex Led to Crazy Politics--and How I Learned to Love Women (and Jesus) Anyway

Book pimping.

“Certainty kills,” he explained

Is he certain of this?

Life is not long enough to conclude anything, it’s only enough to try your best along the way,”

Is he certain of this? And, what was his statement if not a conclusion (two)?

if salvation is correct doctrine, then everyone is lost.

Say what? If salvation is correct doctrine, then those who follow the doctrine are saved. If not, then they are lost. Is Schaeffer babbling here? Or is the babbling being committed by the writer of this piece (Kristin Rudolph)?

To those who hold religious beliefs he said, “believe me, you will someday reach a point where you know that was dumb.

That’s what Atheists say. Nothing new here.

Schaeffer said his life, “for better or worse, worse mainly, happens to intersect the rise of the religious right in America, which also happens to have ruined the United States.”

The “religious right,” as it ultimately came to be known, was a product of the Eighties in response to the phenomenal rise of Ronald Reagan, and Christianity’s growing awareness that they could not continue to ignore the increasing attacks launched against them by Atheists and other Progressive Socialists.

How Schaeffer can pin the “ruin” of America on the “religious right” escapes all comprehension. Christianity (much less the “religious right”) has had precious little influence on American institutions for over seventy years.

Schaeffer claimed he neither sides with the right or the left

Snort! Yet he spouts the standard schtick of the Left’s playbook.

61 posted on 10/07/2011 7:36:04 PM PDT by YHAOS (you betcha!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

>> Franky Schaeffer now says that “religion is dumb” and “man made.”

Christianity is not a religion, Schaeffer, you damn idiot.


62 posted on 10/07/2011 7:36:10 PM PDT by Gene Eric (Your Hope has been Redistributed. Here's your damn Change!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Arthur McGowan
In short, he has a bigger problem with bombing an abortion clinic than he has with 53 million abortions.

Yes he was a strong pro-lifer long ago. His arguments in one of his books are why I am as pro-life as I am today. It is sad to see, and puzzling.

63 posted on 10/07/2011 8:16:35 PM PDT by tenger (It's a good thing we don't get all the government we pay for. -Will Rogers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

he isn’t being very logical.

Give me a good atheist like Hume any time.


64 posted on 10/08/2011 12:55:18 AM PDT by LadyDoc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xp38

Amen & Amen!
“But to as many as received Him to them gave He the power to become the Sons of God.” (John 1:12)

“For the wages of sin is death, but the gift of God is eternal life through Jesus Christ our Lord.” (Romans 6:23)


65 posted on 10/08/2011 2:25:26 AM PDT by LetMarch (If a man knows the right way to live, and does not live it, there is no greater coward. (Anonymous)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Schaeffer presented his views as an alternative to the opposing views of “new atheists” such as Richard Dawkins and Christopher Hitchens, and orthodox Christians. “Secularism” is not the answer, he said, it “is not what it’s cracked up to be,” but also, “it’s not God’s fault that there’s dumb stuff in the Bible.” According to Schaeffer, we are not “stuck with the stupidity of Christianity,” but are free to create our own conception of God, reality, and morality. Not believing in the Christian God “doesn’t mean that a God that loves me … and created love and personality and relationships in a universe that otherwise would be dark and cold isn’t out there.”

The mishmash in his head is probably typical of quite many, if not the majority, of secularized Americans. The only news here is the late Calvinist thinker Francis Schaeffer failed to pass on his faith to his son.

66 posted on 10/08/2011 7:25:01 AM PDT by annalex (http://www.catecheticsonline.com/CatenaAurea.php)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: annalex

There is no “dumb stuff” in the Bible, only “dumb people” who refuse to rightly divide God’s truth so they won’t be ashamed as workmen for the Lord. Those are the people who end up in cults, believing there is more than God’s Word to mankind. They want a little more. Something extra. Something that they can touch, smell, taste, hear, or see to satisfy them.


67 posted on 10/08/2011 7:57:46 AM PDT by smvoice (The Cross was NOT God's Plan B.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: smvoice
There is no “dumb stuff” in the Bible, only “dumb people”

True. Frankie's mistake is easier to make for a Protestant who does not understand the typology of the Old Testament.

Something that they can touch, smell, taste, hear, or see

That is why Christ came incarnate rather than in a book form.

68 posted on 10/08/2011 8:09:42 AM PDT by annalex (http://www.catecheticsonline.com/CatenaAurea.php)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: annalex
Ah, but NOW "Wherefore HENCEFORTH know we no man after the flesh: yea, though we have KNOWN Christ after the flesh, yet NOW HENCEFORTH know we him no more." 2 Cor. 5:16.

NOW we know Him by the Spirit. Not in things we can SEE, HEAR, SMELL, TASTE, or TOUCH.

69 posted on 10/08/2011 8:16:01 AM PDT by smvoice (The Cross was NOT God's Plan B.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Certainty kills

What kind of certainty is he talking about? Is this pre- or postmodern science?

70 posted on 10/08/2011 8:45:07 AM PDT by cornelis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

So the guy never accepted Jesus as his Savior and doesn’t have a clue about things of the Spirit but yet he’s an authority on Christianity...Does any one really listen to this guy???


71 posted on 10/08/2011 8:53:38 AM PDT by Iscool (You mess with me, you mess with the WHOLE trailerpark...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Iscool

The only reason he gets any attention at all is because of who he is biologically related to, not for any accomplishments of his own.


72 posted on 10/08/2011 9:43:01 AM PDT by ReformationFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: smvoice
"They knew Him in the breaking of the bread."
Luke 24:35
73 posted on 10/08/2011 2:38:21 PM PDT by Mrs. Don-o
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Don-o

“And it came to pass, while he blessed them, he was parted from them, and carried up into heaven.” Luke 24:51.


74 posted on 10/08/2011 3:09:26 PM PDT by smvoice (The Cross was NOT God's Plan B.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: attyatlaw001

I feel so sorry for Franky that he has lost his way. But if he comes to the point of acknowledging he is a sinner and claims Christ’s forgiveness, he can yet be saved and become useful to God.


75 posted on 10/08/2011 3:14:47 PM PDT by MarilynBr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: 240B
"This is by no means a ‘revelation’ of anything new. He has simply ‘discovered’ nihilism."

The Dude: Ah, that must be exhausting.


76 posted on 10/08/2011 3:16:39 PM PDT by Future Snake Eater (Don't stop. Keep moving!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: jagusafr
The problem, Schaeffer explained, is belief with certainty. “Certainty kills,”

Is he certain of that?

77 posted on 10/08/2011 3:38:29 PM PDT by WorldviewDad (following God instead of culture)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: smvoice

Yes!


78 posted on 10/08/2011 3:40:53 PM PDT by Mrs. Don-o
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Don-o
"And it came to pass, while he blessed them, he was parted from them, and carried up into heaven." Luke 24:51.

THEREFORE (Because He was carried up into heaven)

"Wherefore HENCEFORTH know we no man after the flesh: yea, though we have known Christ after the flesh, yet NOW HENCEFORTH know we him NO MORE." 2 Cor. 5:16.

He cannot be known NOW by what we feel, taste, hear, smell or see. Which seems to include the Eucharist. And visions and apparitions. And crosses with Christ hanging on them. And so on.

79 posted on 10/08/2011 3:50:31 PM PDT by smvoice (The Cross was NOT God's Plan B.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: smvoice
Paul uses the word "flesh" in several different senses in his writings. The quote says,

"Wherefore henceforth know we no man after the flesh"

It doesn't just say we don't know Jesus Christ in the flesh, but that we don't know anybody ("no man") in the flesh. Now obviously, we can know people by what we feel, taste, hear, smell or see. We all know people through our senses. So what does St. Paul mean when he says we know "no man" in the flesh? Clearly he does not mean that we are all now disincarnated. We have bodies. We are not disembodied. And neither is Christ disincarnated or disembodied. He arose bodily; He ascended bodily.

Where is Christ? He is now at the right hand of the Father in His glorious, resurrected body.

He is also in the Eucharist, for He said "This is My body."

He is also in us, and we are His body. We are the mystical body of Christ.

We now know "no man" in the flesh: we do not think of ANY person in an exclusively mechanistic/materialistic manner anymore. We do not think of persons as limited to matter and energy, time and space. We are embodied spirits: enspirited bodies. We not just "things".

When we imagine persons as just "things" bound by the laws of time and space, we are thinking in the flesh.

Don't you believe that we are the Body of Christ; and the bread He blesses is the Body of Christ (as He said "This IS My Body"); and He is in heaven, having risen in the flesh, and is seated at the right hand of the Father?

He is capable of doing this. Of course He can. Goodness gracious, even electrons and protons can bilocate (LINK!).

And that's just a material phenomenon. It's not even spiritual. It's mere quantum mechanics. And do you think that Jesus Christ, in His totality, His body, blood, soul and divinity, could not even do what an electron can do, and be two places at once??

He is so much greater than what we can grasp in our carnal minds.

P.S. This is coming to you from don-o's account, since I am using my husband's computer right now. [I am not bilocating :o) ] But if you care to respond, please ping it to Mrs. Don-o.

80 posted on 10/08/2011 5:20:12 PM PDT by don-o (He will not share His glory and He will NOT be mocked! Blessed be the name of the Lord forever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson