Posted on 05/08/2012 1:43:29 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
A letter signed by about 500 Emory University faculty, students and alumni seeks to bring attention to the anti-evolution views of Dr. Ben Carson. The world-renowned Johns Hopkins University neurosurgeon will be the Atlanta university's May 14 commencement speaker.
The letter does not ask that Carson be dis-invited. Rather, it seeks to bring attention to the issue. It notes Carson's accomplishments as a neurosurgeon and philanthropist, then adds, "But, as those students, their families, and the Emory Community listen to his speech, we ask you to also consider the enormous positive impact of science on our lives and how that science rests squarely on the shoulders of evolution."
What is most concerning about Carson's beliefs, according to the letter's authors – Emory Professors Jacobus de Roode, Arri Eisen, Nicole Gerardo and Ilya Nemenman – is that Carson "equates acceptance of evolution with a lack of ethics and morality."
The letter describes Carson's objections to the theory of evolution and states that his claims are incorrect because the evidence for evolution is "overwhelming." It also accuses Carson of disregarding the "importance of science" and "critical thinking."
Robert George, McCormick professor of jurisprudence and director of the James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions at Princeton University, argued in a "Mirror of Justice" blog post Sunday that the letter's signers are behaving like illiberal liberals.
"I do wish that more contemporary liberals would be a bit more, well, liberal when it comes to tolerating dissent from the orthodoxies of their faith. Or else I wish they would abandon the pretense of being liberals in the old-fashioned sense and declare their faith to be the equivalent of a religion from which various forms of dissent are simply not to be tolerated. Although I would prefer the former course of action, either course would have the virtue of bringing liberal practice and liberal theory better into line with each other," wrote George, who describes himself as a personal friend of Carson.
George also wrote that Carson does not believe that supporters of the theory of evolution are necessarily unethical. Rather, George explained, Carson believes that Darwinism is necessarily materialistic, a view shared by many Darwinists themselves.
While Carson could be wrong, George argued, "it's certainly not a mean or crazy thing to believe or say. It's scarcely a cause for 'concern' about having him as a commencement speaker."
Carson has delivered 73 commencement speeches since 1989 and received a Presidential Medal of Freedom in 2008, according to Inside Higher Ed. Cuba Gooding, Jr. played Carson in "Gifted Hands: The Ben Carson Story" on TNT in 2009.
In a January 2008 interview on PBS' "Religion & Ethics Newsweekly," Carson describes how his devout Seventh-Day Adventist faith helped him overcome a difficult childhood and guides his medical practice today.
"We are more than just flesh and bones," Carson said. "There's a certain spiritual nature and something of the mind that we can't measure. We can't find it. With all our sophisticated equipment, we cannot monitor or define it, and yet it's there."
I’ve had the pleasure of meeting Dr. Carson (and the displeasure of meeting his rude mother, LOL)
Too bad for the PC police trolling him.
I would have loved to meet him. Why was his mother rude?
“...helped him overcome a difficult childhood...”
Related? And I find it interesting how the folks are somehow saying Carson “disses” science. He’s a neurosurgeon - I imagine that he LOVES science.
Why they didn't take that one step further to propose that depression creates a market for distilled beverages and hallucinogenic drugs I'll never know.
They blame evolution for everything.
True, but they do so because of evolution.
I was thinking it was more like “infantile regression” ~ they are such whiners.
As per the article: “...we ask you to also consider the
enormous positive impact of science on our lives and how
that science rests squarely on the shoulders of evolution.
That is absolute nonsense. The advancement of science rests entirely on the shoulders of the SCIENTIFIC METHOD!!!
When a scientist enters the lab, and God bless him, he DOES
NOT consult the theory of evolution. He does research using
the SCIENTIFIC METHOD.
That deceptive logic irritates me to no end.
Hanging out with surgeons is measured in minutes as they gulp down food and catch up on the outside world before their next case.
He was genuine and one of the brightest in the room. Glad to see he has spiritual consciousness.
I think it’s nice that they’re bringing attention to his “anti-evolution views,” which might otherwise have passed unnoticed in the banalities of a graduation.
It’s common for evolution dogmatists to insist that everyone who disagrees with them must be crazy, uneducated, or both ... but now they’re calling attention to an obviously intelligent man, highly educated in the sciences, who disagrees with them.
Keep it up, keep it up!
What is most concerning about Carson’s beliefs, according to the letter’s authors – Emory Professors Jacobus de Roode, Arri Eisen, Nicole Gerardo and Ilya Nemenman – is that Carson “equates acceptance of evolution with a lack of ethics and morality.”
The proof is in that the global warming scientists does misuse it.
And i believe that the evolutionists do the same thing, all it takes is a little bit here or a little there to be off thousands or hundreds of thousands of years.
Many scientists do not believe in God because they do not understand Gods word, so they try to be God themselves.
Color me skeptical on that "description" of Carson's objections.
If they had a true refutation for his objections, they wouldn't be citing nebulous concepts like "overwhelming evidence" instead of specific points.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.