“...what a condom does is give the couple the ability to express their love without choosing to have a child...”
Altering the marital embrace to make it barren reduces it to essentially the same act as a homosexual act i.e., an act that by its very nature is their way of expressing “love” without having a child. The process of neutering the marital embrace demeans it. Purposely abstaining during the fertile time each month for serious reasons is perfectly acceptable and does not mock the potential procreative act itself.
“Altering the marital embrace to make it barren reduces it to essentially the same act as a homosexual act...”
Dang! I guess those infertile couples who keep on doing it are just a bunch of homos!