While it is within the bounds of this forum to question my logic, my facts and my conclusions, please do not question my honesty.
I provided the the reference to Matthew because whatever St. Peter did from that point forward was in service to the Great Commission he received. That the first group of people he would encounter, in Jerusalem the heart of Judaism, would be predominantly Jews in no way alters St. Peter's life's mission and Papacy.
Peace be with you
It was not my intention to question your honesty. I apologize if I used the wrong word. I would not have said “honestly answered by the reader” but TRUTHFULLY said by the reader. Meaning, the words are there to be read. There can be no misunderstanding of Acts 2 if it is read AS IT IS WRITTEN. To “misunderstand” the simple words that are written cannot be logically explained. You can say you don’t believe Acts 2, but a person cannot say they can’t read CLEARLY what is CLEARLY WRITTEN.