[piasa]

Highly unlikely as he was just a sinful man.
With a stinging sense of humor that got him into the weeds sometimes.
Not to mention he wouldn’t approve because he was very much aware he was a sinner, and in fact didn’t like the term “Lutheran”- that was a term applied by the RC as a put-down.

I’m wondering how well Christians are going to do against Islam when internet trolls have us waging war against eachother like a bunch of zealots angry over whether or not the law allows us to lift a cow out of a well on the Sabbath.

[Alex Murphy]

[Luther] was just a sinful man. With a stinging sense of humor that got him into the weeds sometimes. Not to mention he wouldn’t approve because he was very much aware he was a sinner, and in fact didn’t like the term “Lutheran”- that was a term applied by the RC as a put-down.

Catholics engaging in name-calling and put-downs? I've never heard of such a thing! /sarc>

[xone]

Highly unlikely as he was just a sinful man.

So the of the statuary you have none were sinful? Highly unlikely for a Luther statue in church because it would be an idol.

I’m wondering how well Christians are going to do against Islam when internet trolls have us waging war against eachother like a bunch of zealots angry over whether or not the law allows us to lift a cow out of a well on the Sabbath.

We aren't arguing about cows in wells. Change the ROE to something resembling war, and Christians do just fine against Islamists. And when the time does come outside of a poorly executed national strategy, Islamists better hope there is ROE.