ping
One minute they bash Luther.
The next they hold him up.
When challenged with facts they queue the crickets.
They are experts at ducking and dodging without putting serious thought into anything. (There are two or so exceptions)
From the article....
” Roman Catholic apologists often point to conflicting doctrines within the whole of Protestantism to create need for Romanism, the supposed arbiter of truth. ......Yet if we lump Rome in with all the rest of Christianity (and apply her reasoning) then her disagreements with the Westminster standards, for instance, makes her doctrine as questionable as all the Protestant denominations she would cast doubt upon. ....In response to this Roman Catholics might say that Rome claims infallibility whereas Protestant denominations don’t......... But how does the claim of infallibility establish actual infallibility any more than it points to absolute delusion?!”.......
....By 170 A.D. most of the bible had already been approved and read by the church. ...This was long ‘before any council’.
All the New Testament books were written approximately between 40-65 A.D.. (excluding John written in 75-95 A.D). Therefore it’s more than reasonable that the Bible be used as the test of any Doctrine and based on it’s truth.