Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Hieronymus
Spouting off to the New York Times is great fun, no doubt, but it is a private hobby.

Spouting off to the NYT is not really private, is it?

53 posted on 02/04/2017 8:46:05 PM PST by ebb tide (We have a rogue curia in Rome)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]


To: ebb tide

It isn’t official, which makes it private.

Likewise, a priest (or a Pope) leading a 100,000 faithful in the Rosary at a stadium is still leading them in a private devotion. The same saying Mass “alone” is performing a public action, as he is exercising his priestly office.

One might question the prudence of spouting off to the Times, but better something stupid there than something stupid in an Encyclical.

If by not really private, you merely mean “potentially capable of causing grave scandal,” you may have a point, but the NYT is not where the plentitude of Papal authority is exercised.


56 posted on 02/04/2017 8:58:12 PM PST by Hieronymus (It is terrible to contemplate how few politicians are hanged. --G. K. Chesterton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson