To: Fedora
But your comment illustrates why the early church councils felt the need to emphasize that Mary was the Mother of God (Θεοτόκος): denial of this logically leads to a denial of either Jesus' full divinity or his full humanity. The title *mother of Jesus* was used in Scripture BY THE HOLY SPIRIT, to identify MARY, not JESUS.
*mother of Jesus* identified which of the many Mary's the Holy Spirit was referring to. It was ever used to declare Jesus divinity.
So the Catholic church's excuse for changing that is invalid. It's not their business to try and correct what they see as errors in how the Holy Spirit inspired Scripture.
564 posted on
05/13/2017 8:37:22 AM PDT by
metmom
( ...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith...)
To: metmom
“It’s not their 9the catholic church) business to try and correct what they see as errors in how the Holy Spirit inspired Scripture.” Ah, but they have been doing it for millennia, even changing the wording in Genesis to support Mariology Mythology!
569 posted on
05/13/2017 11:59:05 AM PDT by
MHGinTN
(A dispensational perspective is a powerful tool for discernment)
To: metmom
It's not their business to try and correct what they see as errors in how the Holy Spirit inspired Scripture. Leave that to the JWs and the Mormons.
571 posted on
05/13/2017 3:24:17 PM PDT by
Elsie
(Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
To: metmom
The phrase "Mother of my Lord" is in Luke 1:43. "Lord"="Adonai"="
Yahweh" = "God" (Exodus 3:15). "Mother of God" is simply paraphrasing what Elizabeth says in Luke 1:43. Using synonyms is not "correcting" Scripture.
584 posted on
05/21/2017 5:14:49 AM PDT by
Fedora
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson