Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: rightwingcrazy
Re: “Rubashkin wasn’t convicted of any crimes associated with illegal immigration.”

Perhaps you should explain why?

The government withdrew the immigration case after Rubashkin was convicted on fraud charges, which carried a heavier sentence.

The immigration charges were dismissed “without prejudice,” which means the DOJ can still prosecute Rubashkin.

Also, in exchange for the immigration dismissal, Rubashkin agreed that “evidence of immigration violations” could be examined by the judge who sentenced him for the fraud charges.

One final note - the list of judges, politicians, and former AGs who asked that Rubashkin’s sentence be reduced reads like a Who's Who of the Hard Left and Amnesty RINOs.

34 posted on 12/20/2017 8:32:52 PM PST by zeestephen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: zeestephen
The government withdrew the immigration case after Rubashkin was convicted on fraud charges, which carried a heavier sentence...The immigration charges were dismissed “without prejudice,” which means the DOJ can still prosecute Rubashkin.

My guess his acquittal on state charges of employing illegals, including children, played some part in the decision not to prosecute as well. But they can recharge him now if they like.

42 posted on 12/21/2017 4:28:37 AM PST by SJackson (The easiest way to find something lost around the house is to buy a replacement)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson