Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: aMorePerfectUnion
You're the one that flicked off 2,000 years of moral reasoning of Catholics, Orthodox, Protestant, Reformed and Evangelical, with no interest, as if it were a bit of lint.

This is particularly egregious because, although we have a disagreement which we could have engaged in respectfully, you won't even discuss moral reasoning, nor even --- as far as I can tell --- bother to engage in it.

That's why we're through.

164 posted on 05/17/2018 1:37:44 PM PDT by Mrs. Don-o ("Everything should be made a simple as possible, but not simpler." - Albert Einstein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies ]


To: Mrs. Don-o
You're the one that flicked off 2,000 years of moral reasoning of Catholics, Orthodox, Protestant, Reformed and Evangelical, with no interest, as if it were a bit of lint.

I chose not to respond - and noted that you are again using pejorative language to falsely characterize - because moral reasoning, apart from God's Word is inadequate. Instead, I asked you repeatedly for chapter and verse from God's Word.

Sadly, you could not come up with this, which clearly points out that "moral reasoning" is an opinion that you use to judge everyone who does not agree with your condemnation of those who morally reason that contraception is OK.

As you point out, moral reasoning changes. God's Word is authoritative and never changes.

Moral reasoning not founded on God's Word is simply opinion.

Opinions are fine for your own choices.

It is not adequate to condemn Christians and Jews who disagree.

Have you found anything in God's Word regarding contraception??

165 posted on 05/17/2018 2:15:14 PM PDT by aMorePerfectUnion (Q is Admiral Michael S. Rogers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson