I see no point in engaging in this thread.
After being accused of “negating and discrediting Christ’s sacrifice on the Cross”, “Jesus was resurrected in His Divine nature, not His Human nature”, and “making things up”, I don’t see the point.
I tried on the other thread to clarify what I said but I just kept getting accused of not believing in the bodily resurrection of Christ.
Scripture does not tell us either way if Jesus resurrected body had blood, and to be dogmatic that it did is as much without support as to be dogmatic about Him not having blood.
And claiming that *flesh and bones* by necessity means blood, and to argue that Jesus’ body changed on the way up sounds too much like rationalization, trying to convince me with reason instead of trying to convince me with Scripture.
Flesh and BLOOD cannot inherit the kingdom of God and yet we WILL eat and drink in that kingdom.
This is all I am posting on this thread.
Read the article and there was no accusation against you personally, you must know that; and if not, forgive me, for that was not my intent, rather as you know, my intent is to extricate any Gnostic NAR type thinking from both of our beliefs.
This article addresses your “flesh and blood” vs. flesh and bones concerns, please just read.