Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Texas bishops score major religious liberty battle in fetal remains case
Crux Now ^ | July 17, 2018 | Christopher White

Posted on 07/17/2018 6:06:20 PM PDT by Morgana

NEW YORK - As a case over whether the state of Texas can require fetal remains to be buried is argued in Federal Court this week, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals handed the Texas Conference of Catholic Bishops a major victory just hours before opening arguments began, saying they did not have to comply with a third party subpoena that would have required the bishops to release decades of internal correspondence over the issue of abortion.

In a ruling on Sunday, Judge James Ho said a circuit court’s order was a broad overreach that specifically targeted the Texas bishops with an aim to prevent them from engaging in public policy debates.

“It is hard to imagine a better example of how far we have strayed from the text and original understanding of the Constitution than this case,” wrote Ho.

“The First Amendment expressly guarantees the free exercise of religion - including the right of the Bishops to express their profound objection to the moral tragedy of abortion, by offering free burial services for fetal remains. By contrast, nothing in the text or original understanding of the Constitution prevents a state from requiring the proper burial of fetal remains,” he wrote in a concurring opinion.

In 2017, the Texas Senate passed a bill that would require the cremation or burial of fetal remains. After Texas Governor Greg Abbott signed the bill into law, an ensuing legal battle commenced between the state and Whole Woman’s Health, a network of privately owned abortion clinics.

(Excerpt) Read more at cruxnow.com ...


TOPICS: Catholic; Moral Issues; Religion & Politics
KEYWORDS: abortion; catholic; prolife; texas

1 posted on 07/17/2018 6:06:20 PM PDT by Morgana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Morgana

This strikes me as more of a holding action than a major victory.


2 posted on 07/17/2018 6:11:44 PM PDT by madprof98
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: madprof98
Yeah, you're right, but it's still a big one.

By referencing the Masterpiece case, the Judge was saying the request for the subpoenas was disqualified because it was motivated by anti-religious animus. If you can knock out anything that smells of religious animus, that's --- wow. It's big.

3 posted on 07/17/2018 6:23:44 PM PDT by Mrs. Don-o (My strength will bear thy spirit up / And brace thy heart, and nerve thy arm.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: madprof98

Nowadays you have to take what you can get. And this was definitely better than a lot of outcomes.


4 posted on 07/17/2018 7:07:05 PM PDT by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson