[Sontagged]

I believe this is how I originally got here, in some discussion on the Catholic teaching about the Eucharist with metmom...

A topic which is completely uninteresting to me, outside of the fact that no one should take communion without understanding what Jesus said about it: “do this in remembrance of Me”....

While this article is written by a Catholic, I admire it for honing in on the history of this strange doctrine of a bloodless resurrected Christ.

Which is a Mormon and Jehovah Witness cultic false teaching! Quite alarming.

[daniel1212]

I believe this is how I originally got here, in some discussion on the Catholic teaching about the Eucharist with metmom... A topic which is completely uninteresting to me, outside of the fact that no one should take communion without understanding what Jesus said about it: “do this in remembrance of Me”.... While this article is written by a Catholic, I admire it for honing in on the history of this strange doctrine of a bloodless resurrected Christ. Which is a Mormon and Jehovah Witness cultic false teaching! Quite alarming.

Yes, that is a worthy correction, though not as validating the wore error of the source (even a broken clock is correct twice a day) while the same Bible Christians who in order to resolve an apparent contradiction explain "flesh and blood" as meaning flesh with the blood, are also typically strongly affirm the physical bodily resurrection of Christ, versus the Watchower denial of it. I have been one.

[Elsie]

...without understanding what Jesus said about it: “do this in remembrance of Me”....

Well; just what was Jesus DOING when He said, "Do this in..."?