Pope Francis, by contrast, wants the Catechism to teach that capital punishment ought never to be used (rather than very rarely used), and he justifies this change not on prudential grounds, but so as to better reflect the development of the doctrine on this point. The implication is that Pope Francis thinks that considerations of doctrine or principle rule out the use of capital punishment in an absolute way. Moreover, to say, as the pope does, that the death penalty conflicts with the inviolability and dignity of the person insinuates that the practice is intrinsically contrary to natural law. And to say, as the pope does, that the light of the Gospel rules out capital punishment insinuates that it is intrinsically contrary to Christian morality.
To say either of these things is precisely to contradict past teaching. Nor does the letter from the CDF explain how the new teaching can be made consistent with the teaching of scripture, the Fathers and Doctors of the Church, and previous popes.
1 posted on
08/03/2018 11:39:19 AM PDT by
ebb tide
To: vladimir998
Ping to your claim of “development of doctrine”.
2 posted on
08/03/2018 11:40:04 AM PDT by
ebb tide
(We have a rogue curia in Rome.)
To: ebb tide
HERESY!! Is Francis 1st an AntiPope? Or the AntiChrist?
To: ebb tide
The so-called “pope” is a formal heretic. The seat is vacant, we have no pope. Unless Benedict is, somehow, the real pope.
9 posted on
08/03/2018 11:55:26 AM PDT by
NorthMountain
(... the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed)
To: ebb tide
He doesn’t think there’s a hell, so this is no surprise.
14 posted on
08/03/2018 12:46:50 PM PDT by
I want the USA back
(This week's hypocritical hysteria: Manafort/Russia Probe again!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson