Posted on 08/03/2018 9:55:47 PM PDT by unlearner
Has the word gone out?
Leave this thread?
It must have gone up in smoke of a zotted reply number.
A few have even pined for the return of the Inquisition! Luckily, their temporal power has been diminished bigly.
Do you think they imagine they OWN any and all articles that contain the word "Catholic" on Free Republic???
It did.....
It’s best to post guidelines with more context so that a clearer picture is seen.
I see another poster posted that part of the guidelines with full context.
For everyone:
To see the guidelines for the Religion Forum, click on my name at the bottom of this post.
Quite a few of you need to study these very carefully.
Even if you have been at FR for a long time.
“I just wonder how many Catholics break into Protestant caucuses. There are here now and I for one think it is a fine idea”
I don’t know what you mean by your second sentence.
To address your “wondering” in you first sentence, I don’t have a specific number.
There have been several non-Protestants that have posted in Protestant caucus threads, some more than once.
“More and more I see the Catholic caucus designation being ignored.”
Sometimes it is because the caucus designation doesn’t apply so non-Catholics will post on the threads to let the OP know.
If posting on a caucus by a non member is done knowingly I will deal with it properly. If it is just a mistake, which does happen, and they leave the caucus when it is pointed out to them that they have erred, I will not have to do anything.
The proper way to address a wrongfully placed caucus designation is to send me a FR mail instead of breaking into the caucus.
Click on my name at the bottom of this reply and read the guidelines.
“...some people lurk on the Catholic caucuses hoping and praying for an “in” so the insults can begin”
From my observations that is not what they do.
It appears rather that they just want to join the discussion.
Your statement actually is mindreading with a broad brush, and just your opinion.
You might want to, in the future, send concerns such as these to me through private message.
It’s up to you.
My second sentence was that Protestant caucuses were a fine thing. I thought that’s what I wrote and it is what I meant.
“His/Her first post was to me, informing me of his/her intentions to break a caucus.”
Read the post again and do NOT continue to misrepresent what another poster posts.
No caucus was broken.
Thanks. It wasn’t clear the way you wrote it.
I would think a person should be able to quote themselves accurately; but I error in many of my judgments.
Perhaps a paraphrase is as good as the original.
There are here now and I for one think it is a fine idea.
I’m wondering how a person can think that a Protestant caucus is a fine thing; when their replies here show that they do not think that Protestants themselves are a fine thing.
Heh...
In the real world people say things like that because they like you...They really really like you!
(Stolen from Diaper Boy, Stuart Smalley)
You might want to pay attention to this one.
Can. 1373 A person who publicly incites among subjects animosities or hatred against the Apostolic See or an ordinary because of some act of power or ecclesiastical ministry or provokes subjects to disobey them is to be punished by an interdict or other just penalties.
ebb tide, have the Leadership of the Catholic Church called you out for doing this?
“Who am I to judge?” -—Pope Francis
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.