Which you persist in misunderstanding. Are you claiming Protestants are sacrificing Him "over and over and over"?
You're disagreement is with a Roman Catholic priest.
>> I can tell you what is happening during the Mass.<<
Apparently, you can't.
Well, yes I can based on what O'Brien has written. He, a Roman Catholic priest, which you're not, has explained it pretty clearly.
Catholics don't keep Him nailed to the cross any more than Protestants, who believe the Eucharist "is the true body and blood of our Lord Jesus Christ”. Are you accusing Protestants of keeping Him nailed to the cross? Do you believe in His real presence in the Eucharist as do Protestants?
Yes....Roman Catholics are keeping Him on the Cross as O'Brien notes He is brought down from Heaven by the priest at every Mass. Considering the number of Masses conducted around the world on any given day...He is constantly on the Cross.....which again is in contradiction of what is written in Hebrews.
Do I believe in the "Real Presence" of Christ in the Lord's Supper?
Not as defined by Roman Catholicism which again is in contradiction of the NT.
>>you really have no authority on the issue as a Roman Catholic.<<
I have more authority on understanding Catholic doctrine than do you.
You're a lay RC. You only have opinions.
From these debates, I've been more informed on the issues than most RCs. For instance, you aren't aware Roman Catholic writers have called Mary omnipotent. Most Roman Catholics aren't as they've not bothered to research what their denomination teaches.
Your misunderstanding is of a Catholic priest's writings.
Well, yes I can based on what O'Brien has written.
You can't based on misunderstandings of what he has written.
has explained it pretty clearly
Yet, you misunderstand.
Yes....Roman Catholics are keeping Him on the Cross as O'Brien notes He is brought down from Heaven by the priest at every Mass.
No they don't. But if you truly believe so, then you must believe Protestants keep Him on the cross because they also believe in His real presence in the Eucharist. But you can't seem to bring yourself to admit it.
Not as defined by Roman Catholicism
How about as defined by Protestants: the Eucharist is "the true body and blood of our Lord Jesus Christ”?
You're a lay RC. You only have opinions.
If I have only opinions that doesn't leave you with much as far as teaching Catholic belief.
For instance, you aren't aware Roman Catholic writers have called Mary omnipotent.
Which is false. We've already discussed this. Now you're just reduced to repetition. Instead of rehashing this, go read the earlier posts.
Most Roman Catholics aren't as they've not bothered to research what their denomination teaches.
They've apparently done more research than have you, as every Catholic I know is a magnitude more knowledgeable about Catholic doctrine than are you. You claim Catholics believe something and then argue against your false claim. It's pretty humorous.
You: Not as defined by Roman Catholicism which again is in contradiction of the NT.
I asked if you believed as do Protestants: “it is the true body and blood of our Lord Jesus Christ” but your answer addressed something else. Do you?