Again, you are clueless. You misread, you misstate and it is just a hoot you pretending to tell us what we have to do.
I pulled the quote directly from the vatican's website.
Sure seems Roman Catholics don't like it when their own documents confront their view of Roman Catholicism.
I think a case could be made that Francis’ election was flawed; hence, he was never legally pope; and therefore, also, all of his appointments and the like are invalid.
In that case either Benedict has remained pope, or else the papal chair has been vacant since Benedict retired.
And as usual, all you have done is tell someone thye are wrong without telling anyone what is correct.
Your say so amounts to nothing.
You’ll have to try harder to prove your point.