Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

[Catholic Caucus] 80 US Bishops Want Viganò‘s Claims Investigated
Church Militant ^ | October 4, 2018 | David Nussman

Posted on 10/05/2018 8:22:36 AM PDT by ebb tide

80 US Bishops Want Viganò‘s Claims Investigated

DETROIT (ChurchMilitant.com) - A new site is tracking how American bishops have responded to the McCarrick scandal, and where they stand on the idea of an independent investigation.

Church Transparency lists all the dioceses in the United States, the respective bishops and how the bishops have responded to the bombshell testimony of Abp. Carlo Maria Viganò, former papal nuncio to the United States. Archbishop Viganò claims that Pope Francis lifted sanctions that Pope Benedict XVI had imposed on ex-Cdl. Theodore McCarrick, an alleged homosexual predator.

On the website, prelates fall into one of four categories, based on their response to Viganò's testimony. Many U.S. bishops are in support of an investigation into Viganò's claims, while still others have given a neutral or pastoral response. A large number of bishops have no official statement on record. Only a few bishops, especially those named by Abp. Viganò as allies of McCarrick, have spoken against an investigation.

Forty-one bishops are listed as having "no public statement." Of the 148 bishops with official statements about Viganò's testimony, 80 are supporting an investigation, 63 have remained "neutral or pastoral," and only five are opposed to investigating.

In percentages, that means 54 percent of bishops with statements on the matter are in support of an investigation, 43 percent are neutral and a mere 3 percent are opposed. These statistics do not include bishops with no statement on record about Viganò's testimony.

Free clip from CHURCH MILITANT Premium

WATCH MORE LIKE THIS


Church Militant tried to reach out to the creator of Church Transparency, but could not get in touch with whoever is behind the website. The site merely identifies itself as "a project by a lay Catholic convert from Texas." 

Further digging showed the domain was created in late August, but revealed no information about its owner.

Image

A chart showing how many bishops have supported

an investigation, remained neutral and opposed an

investigation (based on the 148 who have released

officials statements).

According to the site, only five U.S. ordinaries have publicly opposed investigating Viganò's claims. Four of the five prelates were implicated by name in Viganò's initial testimony in August.

Archbishop Viganò's letter discussed Cdl. Donald Wuerl at great length, saying at one point, "His recent statements that he knew nothing about [McCarrick's sexual predation], even though at first he cunningly referred to compensation for the two victims, are absolutely laughable."

"The Cardinal lies shamelessly," Viganò commented, "and prevails upon his Chancellor, Monsignor Antonicelli, to lie as well."

Viganò references Bp. McElroy, saying that his appointment to the San Diego diocese was "orchestrated from above" by the Vatican.

The former papal nuncio testified about Cdl. Joseph Tobin and Cdl. Blase Cupich, "The appointments of Blase Cupich to Chicago and Joseph W. Tobin to Newark were orchestrated by McCarrick, Maradiaga and Wuerl."

He went on to call out Cdl. Cupich: "Regarding Cupich, one cannot fail to note his ostentatious arrogance, and the insolence with which he denies the evidence that is now obvious to all: that 80 percent of the abuses found were committed against young adults by homosexuals who were in a relationship of authority over their victims."

Archbishop Michael Jackels of Dubuque, Iowa also opposed an investigation into Abp. Viganò's allegations. He is the only U.S. prelate opposed to an investigation who was not named in Abp. Vigano's testimony. 

Jackels said in a statement on Sept. 6, "I have not read the letter accusing the Holy Father, but those who have, and who are in the know, comment on how there are many holes in the testimony, and that it is sometimes ambiguous." 

He went on to argue, "With regard to the accusation, some people (even some bishops), with hardly the time for mature reflection, let alone consultation with a Review Board, have opined that it is not only credible, but that the Pope must be guilty." 

Archbishop Jackels blasted Abp. Viganò's supporters, accusing them of treating the Pope as though he were guilty until proven innocent.


TOPICS: Apologetics; Catholic; Moral Issues
KEYWORDS: francischurch; homos; mccarrick; wuerl
Catholic Caucus
1 posted on 10/05/2018 8:22:36 AM PDT by ebb tide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Al Hitan; Biggirl; Bigg Red; Coleus; DuncanWaring; ebb tide; Fedora; heterosupremacist; ...

Ping


2 posted on 10/05/2018 8:25:26 AM PDT by ebb tide (We have a rogue curia in Rome.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ebb tide

My bishop is in the “neutral” camp. I’m not surprised.


3 posted on 10/05/2018 8:40:57 AM PDT by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ebb tide

Church Militant has reported that Cdl Gerhard Mueller was pulled off the altar while celebrating mass in 2013 by Pope Francis and told to desist investigating charges of sexual abuse against the late Cdl Murphy-O’Connor. At the time Mueller was Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, the church organ ultimately responsible for sex abuse investigations.

Just days ago Mueller, while demurring on providing a full confirmation of the report due to being “bound [by] the Pontifical Secret,” did confirm that the investigation was halted.

Without question Pope Francis is in the pocket of the Lavender Mafia.

Here’s something I wrote the other day on another site:

The Lavender Mafia, sometimes known as St Galen’s Mafia, is a powerful cabal of cardinals, bishops and priests in the Church made up of clergy sympathetic to gay rights and gay clergy, and adverse to prosecution of priests accused of abuse. Since reasonable estimates put the number of gay Catholic clergy at well over one third of all priests (some estimates go as high as fifty percent), clearly the Lavender Mafia wields tremendous power in the RCC. When he was a cardinal, Pope Francis was heavily backed by this group after John Paul II’s death, but Pope Benedict edged him out in the papal election. Very mysteriously, only a few years later Benedict resigned, the first pope to do so since 1415, and Francis took his place.

For Francis the gay agenda is close to his heart, along with every other trendy socialist idea around. The corruption of the modern Church has found its apotheosis in the papacy of Francis. It now may be impossible to purify the Church short of a schism. If one happens, a battle will be on for which side will retain the Vatican. The schismatics have dogma and doctrine on their side, the Lavender Mafia has the favor of the fallen world.


4 posted on 10/05/2018 9:59:30 AM PDT by beckett (Amor Fati)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson