Thanks for posting. I give the article 80% and B-.
Many good points. The positive is that the author provides references for future research. The negative is that the author makes deceptive arguments, such as false either or, hasty generalization, poisoning the well, and attacking the motive. Sad.
Pope John Paul II and Pope Benedict XVI “were swimming in a lake of Kool-Aid rather than the ocean of Tradition.” False.
The author is swimming in the pool of frustration. Probably.
The author listed some of the cardinals appointed by JPII and Benedict XVI, can you defend those appointments?