To: ebb tide
When a king has a successor, that king is no longer king; his successor is. To declare the bishop of Rome (Peter) has a successor is merely to declare that Peter is no longer on Earth to reign as bishop. To declare that Christ has a successor is to worship the anti-Christ.
13 posted on
10/27/2018 9:40:27 AM PDT by
dangus
("The floor of Hell is paved with the skulls of bishops" -- St. Athanasius)
To: dangus
That's it. Any Pope who calls himself the "successor" (not "vicar", but "successor) of Christ is anti-Christ.
But what if Francis' lackeys that say that --- and the pope doesn't say so himself, but doesn't correct his lackeys either? Is that why they call the Enemy "The Deceiver"?
14 posted on
10/27/2018 9:57:57 AM PDT by
Mrs. Don-o
(It ain't what they don't know that's a problem, it's what they do know that ain't so." - Will Rogers)
To: dangus
To declare that Christ has a successor is to worship the anti-Christ.And this "god of surprises" that Bergolio continually references is not God.
15 posted on
10/27/2018 10:23:44 AM PDT by
ebb tide
(We have a rogue curia in Rome.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson