https://www.amazon.com/MADE-THIS-WAY-Trent-Horn/dp/1683570979
The problem I invariably have with such statements is the explicit approbation of the Nineteenth Century ersatz term, homosexuality.
There is no such thing - and that word is not used in the Bible; what is used is not a legitimizing name but the functional, descriptive action of a man lying with a man as a man would lie with a woman. A man lying with a woman is the real thing; a man lying with another man is a pretense - and hence a perversion of nature.
There is no such thing as a functional form of human sexuality between two members of the same sex. Sexuality exists because of its inherent procreative function.
What exists between two such is eroticism, not sexuality.
For this reason, I absolutely refuse to use the validating terms of gay or homosexual: They are homoerotics.
When a man can impregnate a man without any artificial engineering, or a woman can impregnate a woman without any artificial engineering, then I will reconsider my position.
https://www.amazon.com/MADE-THIS-WAY-Trent-Horn/dp/1683570979