Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: OddLane
[The nature of the Gospel in the first century was a "political" proclamation and not limited to the salvation of the soul]

What.......I must not be reading this correctly.
5 posted on 02/16/2019 12:30:57 PM PST by SaveFerris (Luke 17:28 ... as it was in the days of Lot; they did eat, they drank, they bought, they sold ......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: SaveFerris

Another misguided, sinful, selfish soul reading into the Bible what he/she wants to.


6 posted on 02/16/2019 12:40:52 PM PST by SoConPubbie (Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: SaveFerris

I bit the bullet, and clicked to listen to the video because I was curious about what his argument would be. But I have to admit that when he right away started rambling about the gospel was meant to “Changie the social order” and “the restore of the cosmos” I just could not listen to any more. Why do some people want to make the subject so complicated? Perhaps it is an attempt to make themselves sound more more intelligent, and important.


10 posted on 02/16/2019 1:33:02 PM PST by Apple Pan Dowdy (... as American as Apple Pie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: SaveFerris
[The nature of the Gospel in the first century was a "political" proclamation and not limited to the salvation of the soul]

Just to be clear, John MacArthur did not state this. This is the position of the person narrating this video who pointedly says he disagrees with MacArthur who believes the gospel is only for our salvation.

And I agree with you and Dr. MacArthur.

11 posted on 02/16/2019 1:35:19 PM PST by HarleyD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson