To: OddLane
[The nature of the Gospel in the first century was a "political" proclamation and not limited to the salvation of the soul]
What.......I must not be reading this correctly.
5 posted on
02/16/2019 12:30:57 PM PST by
SaveFerris
(Luke 17:28 ... as it was in the days of Lot; they did eat, they drank, they bought, they sold ......)
To: SaveFerris
Another misguided, sinful, selfish soul reading into the Bible what he/she wants to.
6 posted on
02/16/2019 12:40:52 PM PST by
SoConPubbie
(Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
To: SaveFerris
I bit the bullet, and clicked to listen to the video because I was curious about what his argument would be. But I have to admit that when he right away started rambling about the gospel was meant to Changie the social order and the restore of the cosmos I just could not listen to any more. Why do some people want to make the subject so complicated? Perhaps it is an attempt to make themselves sound more more intelligent, and important.
10 posted on
02/16/2019 1:33:02 PM PST by
Apple Pan Dowdy
(... as American as Apple Pie)
To: SaveFerris
[The nature of the Gospel in the first century was a "political" proclamation and not limited to the salvation of the soul] Just to be clear, John MacArthur did not state this. This is the position of the person narrating this video who pointedly says he disagrees with MacArthur who believes the gospel is only for our salvation.
And I agree with you and Dr. MacArthur.
11 posted on
02/16/2019 1:35:19 PM PST by
HarleyD
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson