Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


Attorney John Mauck speaks during a press conference about a legal complaint filed on behalf of four Wheaton College students at Millennium Park in Chicago, Illinois on Sept. 18, 2019.
1 posted on 09/19/2019 8:30:07 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: SeekAndFind

Wheaton is a great college. In 20/20 hindsight I wish I had gone there.


2 posted on 09/19/2019 8:34:40 AM PDT by Drango (1776 = 2020)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Yet it’s okay that these progressives “evangelize” to my children every day at school regarding their religion of “progressivism” ....


3 posted on 09/19/2019 8:38:17 AM PDT by mikelets456
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Good thing they weren’t smoking or vaping. They’d’ve been shot on sight.


4 posted on 09/19/2019 8:38:47 AM PDT by fruser1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Moonies are allowed in airports. Hopefully they will win easily.


6 posted on 09/19/2019 8:54:32 AM PDT by PghBaldy (12/14 - 930am -rampage begins... 12/15 - 1030am - Obama's advance team scouts photo-op locations.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

But any progressive collection of clowns could hold a “Come and see our mental problems” seminar there and they’d be applauded.


7 posted on 09/19/2019 8:54:36 AM PDT by Da Coyote (eh)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind
These political elites who continue to categorize and criticize "baskets" of citizens who oppose their coercive ideology might consider the words of the man known as "the father of the Constitution" under which they serve:
Excerpt:
Excerpt "Because we hold it for a fundamental and undeniable truth, “that Religion or the duty which we owe to our Creator and the Manner of discharging it, can be directed only by reason and conviction, not by force or violence.”

"The Religion then of every man must be left to the conviction and conscience of every man; and it is the right of every man to exercise it as these may dictate. This right is in its nature an unalienable right. It is unalienable; because the opinions of men, depending only on the evidence contemplated by their own minds, cannot follow the dictates of other men: It is unalienable also; because what is here a right towards men, is a duty towards the Creator. It is the duty of every man to render to the Creator such homage, and such only, as he believes to be acceptable to him. This duty is precedent both in order of time and degree of obligation, to the claims of Civil Society. Before any man can be considered as a member of Civil Society, he must be considered as a subject of the Governor of the Universe: And if a member of Civil Society, who enters into any subordinate Association, must always do it with a reservation of his duty to the general authority; much more must every man who becomes a member of any particular Civil Society, do it with a saving of his allegiance to the Universal Sovereign. We maintain therefore that in matters of Religion, no man’s right is abridged by the institution of Civil Society, and that Religion is wholly exempt from its cognizance." - James Madison

Is there anywhere a clearer statement of the underlying principle of the U. S. Constitution's provisions and protections for "the People's" rights and liberties?

The very foundation of the Founders' Declaration of Independence from a "government-over-people" rule to one of a people's recognition of "overruling Providence" and "people-over-government" liberty was summarized in Jefferson's, "The God who gave us life, gave us liberty at the same time: the hand of force may destroy, but cannot disjoin them."

In our generation, do we not see that "hand of force" unmasked at the same time as that same "hand" not only is reluctant to recognize Madison's "Creator," "the Governor of the Universe," and "Universal Sovereign," or Jefferson's "the God who gave us life," but utilizes that "hand of force" to deny public discourse to include those descriptions in its "politically-correct" discourse or teaching of the youth of America?


9 posted on 09/19/2019 9:23:37 AM PDT by loveliberty2 (`)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

so the 1’st amendment is now only allowed in certain designated public areas? Who gets to decide what speech is acceptable, and what isn’t? (And yes, you can yell fire in a crowded theater- infact you should when there is a fire- so that isn’t a valid argument against 1’st amendment in public spaces-

Let’s hope the courts uphold our constitution!


11 posted on 09/19/2019 9:39:46 AM PDT by Bob434
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

I remember a time when Chicago parks allowed honest-to-god Neo Nazis to give speeches there in the name of the First Amendment.

Times have changed.


12 posted on 09/19/2019 10:39:00 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog (Patrick Henry would have been an anti-vaxxer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Hey, man. Free market. Build your own...

/sarcoff


13 posted on 09/19/2019 3:34:11 PM PDT by YogicCowboy ("I am not entirely on anyone's side, because no one is entirely on mine." - J. R. R. Tolkien)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson