Posted on 10/02/2019 6:24:19 PM PDT by lightman
Therefore:
Lutheran (EL C S*A) Ping!
* as of August 19, AD 2009, a liberal protestant SECT, not part of the holy, catholic and apostolic CHURCH.
Be rooted in Christ!
The August 19 date referes solely to the adoption of the gaysbian agenda, NOT to the “Full Communion” agreement.
Fake Bishop. Fake church.
Obviously these people only read redacted versions of the Bible.
I seem to recall that the “People in the pews” supported the golden calf....
Just sayin’
Love,
O2
Keep up your faithful work....you have my utmost thanks.
I ping my Missouri Synod Lutheran family members and friends to your articles....and they, also, are very appreciative.
Leni/MinuteGal
Here in Northern Virginia, my senior pastor told us last Sunday that the UMC is almost certainly heading for a schism over the LGBTQUERTY issue at next year's General Conference. [And while this is going on, the Virginia Conference seems to have nothing to say about our governor basically endorsing infanticide.]
The other thing that fascinated me about the upcoming General Conference is how the overseas jurisdictions will have 20 or so more delegates than they did at the recent called General Conference--while the North American conferences have lost a similar number. The UMC is growing overseas--where traditional biblical values are preached.
If there is support of her in the pews, they can vote to leave. They could join another denomination or start their own.
The Fort Worth, Texas episcopal diocese voted by a two thirds margin to join the conservative African Episcopal church union a few years ago. A number of individual churches voted to change association, too, but Fort Worth was the only entire diocese.
If her members voted, they could choose to become liberal Lutheran, Episcopalian or something else.
Women are not Biblically eligible.
(Sodom and Laodicea live here and now).
1 Timothy, Chapter 3
1 This is a true saying, If a man desire the office of a bishop, he desireth a good work.
2 A bishop then must be blameless, the husband of one wife, vigilant, sober, of good behaviour, given to hospitality, apt to teach;
3 Not given to wine, no striker, not greedy of filthy lucre; but patient, not a brawler, not covetous; 4 One that ruleth well his own house, having his children in subjection with all gravity;
5 (For if a man know not how to rule his own house, how shall he take care of the church of God?)
They are unlikely to do this; they undoubtedly want to split the church, forcing the “old guard” to leave, keeping the church property and the name.
Wow. This person isn’t even in the ballpark. They’re not even close to the ballpark.
The formal name for this logical fallacy is selection bias.
Satan’s beaming proudly at one of his favorite children.
Interesting how she defines “disagreement” with her views as “hate”.
How very “liberal” and “Tolerant” of her!
For which synod is she the bishop? I hope I haven’t been in one of those churches.
QUERTY? QWERTY I understand.
Bingo!
Bingo!
Your church cannot be a democracy.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.