Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: bk1000

Indeed, it states the “sons of God” knew the “daughters of men”.

I have no problem with that at all. it is the leap to assume that the sons of god in this text actually means outcast fallen angels/demons who were created, not begotten and therefore not sons at all.


26 posted on 10/31/2019 8:30:42 AM PDT by Manly Warrior (US ARMY (Ret), "No Free Lunches for the Dogs of War")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]


To: Manly Warrior

Things were very different before the flood. In the New Testament, Jesus is referred to as His “only begotten son”. That might be construed as He considered His other created beings sons, of a sort. There was a different covenant in force then. I am far from an expert, and not adequately equipped for a deep discussion on this, but I do enjoy the discussion, just the same.


32 posted on 10/31/2019 8:48:17 AM PDT by bk1000 (I stand with Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson