Fine. Mass extermination for land isn't genocide.
What, then, is the point of the article? Craig addressed the mass extermination. Was that not meant to be a response to Dawkins?
Did the Christian Post juxtapose Dawkins' accusation and Craig's response just for the hell of it?
Or was maybe Craig addressing the genocide accusation when he made his response?
You’re babbling because you hate the truth.
I hope eventually you learn that lies and nonsense don’t make the truth go away.