no.
No!
The answer has to be no.
Making a judgement of the value of the life of another human is slavery at its basest form.
If an adult makes, of his own free will, a personal decision to sacrifice his body to provide a source of protection to millions of others, it would be a different answer.
If we allow that it is okay to sacrifice the body of a fully developed human infant to provide that same source of protection, but we specify it is not unethical because the baby is only halfway down the birth canal and not all the way birthed, then it opens a moral morass.
If that rationalization is allowed, then the life of any human is not their own. Who is to say that, because I may have a certain type of DNA or tissue...or an organ for transplant (like...a heart) that could, for example, be used to keep an important party leader alive, that my own life can be rationally taken from me against my will.
nope
next question
That’s a no-brainer for anyone with morals and integrity. Not only no, but hell no!
I get a pre-throw-up feeling at the base of my throat - it’s physically repulsive to even hear about using murdered babies. Not to mention useless — adult stem cells are just as more if not more useful, or so I’ve read. Leftists promoted this to normalize murder and make everyone complicit. N O T M E!
And yes, I stopped vaccinating my children when I found they were from babies.
1. Doing so provides a false moral justification for the murder.
2. Doing so provides a continued market, and thus incentive, for the byproducts of murder.
No
The end does not justify the means
In Catholic teaching, based on remote material cooperation, it is permitted under certain circumstances.
Check out which vaccines are ethical, and which are not: