Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: ebb tide
From your last post Did Martin Luther Really Want James Taken Out of the Bible?:

    Faith without works

    The Catholicism of Martin Luther’s time was hyper-focused on the value of works, but Luther found that Scripture repeatedly asserts we are saved through faith in Jesus Christ, not by anything we do. And yet the Book of James says that faith without works is dead (James 2:26). So what are we supposed to do with that? Was Luther wrong—do we need works to be saved? Or is James contradicting Peter and other important passages about the Christian faith?

    The reality is that James is not suggesting in any way that works lead to our salvation. It’s a result of it.


Do you actually READ the links you cite???

147 posted on 11/03/2020 5:56:42 PM PST by boatbums (Lord, make my life a testimony to the value of knowing you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies ]


To: boatbums
Yes, I read what I posted.

“We should throw the epistle of James out of this school, for it doesn’t amount to much. It contains not a syllable about Christ. Not once does it mention Christ, except at the beginning. I maintain that some Jew wrote it who probably heard about Christian people but never encountered any. Since he heard that Christians place great weight on faith in Christ, he thought, ‘Wait a moment! I’ll oppose them and urge works alone.’ This he did.”

Luther was no different that Muhammad. They both created religions to their own liking.

148 posted on 11/03/2020 7:16:40 PM PST by ebb tide (We have a rogue curia in Rome.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson