I know it's long, but sometimes you just cannot get across what you need too get across without a long post. If you like history you will like this. If you like delving into seldom discussed topics on the Scriptures, you will like this. If not. I understand. Many do not like reading a book when they click on a post.
Regardless of the camp you are in, God bless you all.
1 posted on
12/27/2020 3:41:49 PM PST by
OneVike
To: Kartographer; Jane Long; dragonblustar; goodnesswins; Salvation; Waryone; TNoldman; chicagolady; ...
This is a long post, but well worth the read if you have the time. It's actually a post with two different topics. If you like history, you will find the first part which is shorter interesting. If you like reading conjectures on the Scriptures you will find the longer portion truly fascinating.
Send FReep Mail to
OneVike
to get
[ON] or [OFF]
My Ping List
2 posted on
12/27/2020 3:44:56 PM PST by
OneVike
(Just another Christian waiting to go home)
To: OneVike
3 posted on
12/27/2020 3:46:11 PM PST by
Parmy
To: OneVike
Thank you for the post!
God Bless!!
4 posted on
12/27/2020 3:46:41 PM PST by
foundedonpurpose
(Praise Hashem, for his restoration of all things!)
To: OneVike
5 posted on
12/27/2020 3:50:50 PM PST by
MNDude
To: OneVike
In those days, boys were recognized as men earlier than they do today and I don’t doubt that a *teen* in Jesus’ day was more mature and responsible than most men in their 20’s these days.
Maturity is not simply a matter of marking off years on a calendar.
6 posted on
12/27/2020 3:51:34 PM PST by
metmom
(...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith.....)
To: OneVike
Interesting read! I wonder, would a tax collector have such a role at/in their early twenties? Also, Mattehw was a well educated man. I’ve always thought of John as being maybe fifteen, maybe even as young as thirteen while the Lord walked among them. His young age would have been an asset since the ‘adults’ arrayed against Jesus would have considered him too young to be a threat to their plotting.
8 posted on
12/27/2020 4:02:46 PM PST by
MHGinTN
(A dispensation perspective is a powerful tool for discernment)
To: Interesting Times; xzins
I’m sure our late fellow Freeper “Zot” would have found this article worth reading and considering.
10 posted on
12/27/2020 5:07:26 PM PST by
GreyFriar
(Spearhead - 3rd Armored Division 75-78 & 83-87)
To: OneVike
Will read in a full screen later, but from discussion with several Hebrew rabbis and acquaintances, it is safe to say none were older than Jesus and most likely just had become of age, so 13-20s.
Paul was a likely contemporary of the apostles and he was martyrs in 68-69, probably in his 50s. John, likely lived till as late as the late 90s, perhaps into his 80s....
Cool.
11 posted on
12/27/2020 5:54:05 PM PST by
Manly Warrior
(US ARMY (Ret), "No Free Lunches for the Dogs of War" )
To: OneVike
I have always felt and believed that Peter and Mathew were very close to the same age as Jesus,I could go along with the others being in early 20s and John being 15-17
To: OneVike
19 posted on
12/27/2020 9:06:01 PM PST by
kelly4c
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson