bookmark
A new, more comprehensive approach to disproving the creator hypothesis: That’s racist!
A good read - The Science of God. Gerald L. Schroeder
It aligns with my three reasons: 1) Big Bang Theory suggests a first cause, or Creator (God); 2) The universe is too young to have its high degree of order and complexity arise from accident and randomness. Darwin was wrong. This suggests an order giver (God); 3) The universe was created so intricately that if the natural forces were out by the minutest degree, life would not exist. The chances that this happened naturally — that we won the life sweepstake — is insanely huge. This is the argument from design (God).
Interesting video on the probability of even one amino acid chain assembling by random chance.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W1_KEVaCyaA
Bookmark
I’ve said for a long time: It takes more faith to believe in the “theory” of evolution than it does to believe in God.
And I’m not religious.
He left out Schrödinger’s equation and Godel’s Incompleteness Theorem.
A lot of atheistic explanations start with “given an infinite amount of time ...” I’ve even had them go so far as to reference “the time before the Big Bang.” That gem came from a mathematics professor from Georgia Tech. I asked him where the math department was at Tech relative to the physics department. I don’t think he got it.
“the idea that God created the universe [is] a more respectable hypothesis today than at any time in the last 100 years.”
unfortunately, that begs the obvious question; ‘and who created God?’...
Scientists proving God exists always cracks me up. Look around ya dummies and open your eyes. My scientific approach has generally been trying to figure out how God DID the things he did. Quite awe inspiring if’n ya ask me.
There is one more piece of evidence I have found . Not doubt someone else has thought of it before me but we are literally surrounded by it : Oxygen.
Oxygen is a very reactive element . It easily combines with many chemicals and makes fire possible. That same energy makes it possible for animals to move around. Why are plants wasting so much energy pumping out this expensive waste product? A plant that evolved without having to waste that energy would out compete the others but that did not happen! Sounds a little like divine tinkering at play here, as far as I am concerned.
It is my opinion that trying to use science to prove the existence of god shows a profound lack of faith. Not to mention that it can’t be done.
Who could see a supposedly hedonistic and ego-driven man like Trump being God's instrument to counteract and slow the rampant evil? We see the true nature of it in the black spaces where Biden's eyes should be as he signs Executive Orders never read nor comprehended while the Supreme Court has somehow been compromised/neutralized.
These ARE times that try us. I think we should take note of who denies God for the sake of human hubris/arrogance for those are the ones who've lost the ability to hear God with their soul. And they are almost always Democrat. Hence so few stepping up after aiding the massive fraud - utter lack of sense of guilt.
Rabbi Nachmanides described the Big Bang about 800 years ago.
Bookmark
Currently reading “Darwin’s Doubt” after having finished “Signature In The Cell” and “Return Of The God Hypothesis” (all three of Stephen Meyer’s books).
All three are very well done, presenting the proofs for ID beyond logical dispute.
If you’ve not read any of them, and are considering reading them, start with “Return Of The God Hypothesis” first. It covers all four of his major categories pointing undeniably to ID, then “Signature” and “Darwin’s Doubt” go into two of the four in great detail.