Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

[Catholic Caucus] New head of JPII marriage institute suggests Church must change its definition of family
LifeSite News ^ | September 23, 2021 | Jeanne Smits

Posted on 09/24/2021 10:34:51 AM PDT by ebb tide

[Catholic Caucus] New head of JPII marriage institute suggests Church must change its definition of family

Monsignor Philippe Bordeyne claims that 'theologians cannot continue to assert certainties about the family when we see the transformations it is undergoing today.'

(LifeSiteNews) — Weeks after taking up his post as new president of the former John Paul II Institute for Marriage and Family, Monsignor Philippe Bordeyne made a remarkable statement in a revealing interview with La Croix International, the English-language daily edited by La Croix, unofficial daily of the French episcopate, saying, “We theologians cannot continue to assert certainties about the family when we see the transformations it is undergoing today.”

What are “certainties” about the family seen from the Catholic point of view? They are definitions, rules of life. They are reflections based on the natural realities and aims of marriage, and the natural laws that govern it. They are the result of the scrutiny of the revelation that tells of God’s plan for mankind, of the supernatural objective of procreation, which is to people God’s heaven with saints, and of the nature and value of sacramental marriage, which is a reflection of Jesus’ love for the Church.

When St. John Paul II founded the Pontifical Institute for Studies on Marriage and the Family, it was clearly and profoundly attached to traditional Catholic doctrine on marriage, acknowledging the existence of absolute moral norms that are always binding and prohibit intrinsically evil acts. Such were the “certainties” mentioned above – and the fact that they were certainties did not make them uninteresting or rigid in the sense that they could not account for new realities of the day.

On the contrary, they were the principles, the supporting walls on which the Church could build in order to assess modernity and, if necessary, challenge it with the help of faith and reason – as it did, for instance, with gender ideology, which is a radical negation of the rules of God’s creation.

When Bordeyne states that “We theologians cannot continue to assert certainties about the family when we see the transformations it is undergoing today,” he is saying in substance that there is no sure ground from which to assess these transformations, and if need be, to condemn them and to show that they are not in accordance with man’s true needs and calling.

His declaration shows that as a hand-picked new president of what is now the John Paul II Pontifical Theological Institute for Marriage and Family Sciences,” Bordeyne is fully on board with the revolution that is taking place there. It started with the sudden dismissal of the Institute’s head, Monsignor Livio Melina, a faithful successor of its founder, Cardinal Carlo Caffarra, in 2019. At the same time, all of the Institute’s professors were suspended – not all returned – and under its new Chancellor, Archbishop Vincenzo Paglia of homoerotic fresco fame, the door was opened to criticism of Humanae vitae that condemns contraception and to the glorification of Amoris Laetitia, in which Pope Francis discreetly welcomed certain divorced and civilly remarried couples to receive the sacraments, including Holy Communion, without intending to change their way of life.

Bordeyne was the rector of the French capital’s famed Catholic University, L’Institut catholique de Paris, for 10 years. His specialty is moral theology (without “certainties”?). He was an “expert” at the second Synod on the Family named by Pope Francis. He has co-authored a book with one of Jorge Bergoglio’s most influential Argentinian mentors, Father Juan Carlos Scannone, who adapted “theology of the people” from Liberation theology: Divorcés remariés : ce qui change avec François (“The Divorced and Remarried, what is changing with Francis”) – is all about “discernment” and “accompanying complicated situations” even unto reception of Holy Communion.

Bordeyne has spoken in favor of a “private blessing” for homosexual pairs and suggested that “human sexuality, which is ultimately not very determined, allows for atypical forms and expressions.” He has also stated that couples could be left to decide about using contraception or not and that they could accompany that decision by “redoubling their mutual love.”

Now that he has taken up his new position at the head of an Institute whose original aim was to uphold the Church’s traditional teachings on marriage and the family, Bordeyne appears not to have been touched by grace … At 61, he can be expected to hold onto his particular ideology, which is founded on the idea that we are in an “era of change,” as he told Loup Besmond de Senneville in the interview, especially with the “pandemic,” in which “the family” is one of the “new frontiers” where theologians must go.

“We are in a moment that is a bit similar to what John F. Kennedy experienced in 1960, when he won the Democratic nomination. At that time, he saw no choice but to take on board a world that had changed at great speed. Similarly, I believe that we are in a similar era of change today. And it is because our times are changing so rapidly that the Church must be more humble before the mystery of the family,” he said.

Asked whether the Church is not already humble enough, Bordeyne replied that it “has not always been humble enough to recognize that there are important changes in the way families are formed.” “This is what Pope Francis keeps repeating, especially in the exhortation Amoris laetitia (…) This lack of humility, in my opinion, is reflected in the temptation to oversimplify issues surrounding the family and to give ready-made answers. We theologians cannot continue to assert certainties about the family when we see the transformations it is undergoing today,” he added.

What are today’s transformations? Cohabitation before or without marriage, the explosion of the number of births out of wedlock in Western countries, widespread divorce, the denaturation of marriage itself, which is presented as possibly uniting two men or two women, widespread refusal of procreation, sexual promiscuity promoted by the media and many states.

Without saying all these trends are good, Bordeyne said, “Theologians are researchers, and therefore they draw on the light of tradition, but also on the strength of kerygma, which is the proclamation of Christ alive to families today” and that it is necessary to “deepen the way Jesus would look at complex situations, or the slowness of young people to choose marriage,” adding that the Church “cannot hide its eyes from the societal transformations we are witnessing.” As if it ever did.

It seems as if Bordeyne is lamenting the fact that the Church is not changing its language and priorities in the face of these “societal transformations.”

He also proclaimed that he does not have the intention of turning the John Paul II Institute into the “Amoris Laetitia Institute,” protesting that “the teaching of Francis is not reduced to Amoris laetitia, and that of John Paul II is not reduced to Familiaris Consortio. Each is well within its time, but there is no contradiction between the two.”

This is truly the official narrative on Pope Francis’ innovations: It is the search to implement change while proclaiming that expressions of Catholic doctrine that are clearly modified through such change are in fact acceptable “evolutions” dictated by changed circumstances.

Bordeyne’s full interview is available here.


TOPICS: Apologetics; Catholic; Moral Issues; Religion & Culture
KEYWORDS: apostatepope; bidenvoters; bordeyne; degenerate; fatima; francischism; gaymarriage; homofamilies; homofascism; homosexualagenda; lavendermafia; philippebordeyne; sodomandgomorrah; ssm

1 posted on 09/24/2021 10:34:51 AM PDT by ebb tide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: amihow; Al Hitan; DuncanWaring; Fedora; irishjuggler; Jaded; JoeFromSidney; kalee; markomalley; ...

Ping


2 posted on 09/24/2021 10:35:31 AM PDT by ebb tide (We have a rogue curia in Rome.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ebb tide

Oooohhh. Put that ultimatum to the actual head of the Church, Jesus Christ, and see how far that gets you.


3 posted on 09/24/2021 10:39:06 AM PDT by wbarmy (I chose to be a sheepdog once I saw what happens to the sheep.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ebb tide

Did I miss the “latest” edition to the Bible? Has God change His mind? He defined marriage “in the beginning” - man now thinks he knows more than God?

Be careful - - - be very careful.


4 posted on 09/24/2021 10:43:27 AM PDT by impactplayer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ebb tide

Monsignor is out of his mind. Bergoglio has to go. Enough already.


5 posted on 09/24/2021 10:47:08 AM PDT by FlyingEagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ebb tide

6 posted on 09/24/2021 10:57:10 AM PDT by Pollard (Some people like to argue just to argue.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ebb tide

Saint JP2 disagrees :

https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/st-john-paul-iis-totally-catholic-response-when-gay-pride-parade-came-to-r/


7 posted on 09/24/2021 10:57:49 AM PDT by faithhopecharity (Politicians are not born, they are excreted. Marcus Tullius Cicero (106 to 43 BCE))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ebb tide

might’s well change the definition of of what being Catholic is

wait, that’s what they’re doing... nevermind


8 posted on 09/24/2021 11:03:15 AM PDT by Chode (there is no fall back position, there's no rally point, there is no LZ... we're on our own. P144:1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ebb tide

That’s fine, I’ve changed my definition of the Catholic Church to include the words “now known as a political action group”.


9 posted on 09/24/2021 12:06:28 PM PDT by SaxxonWoods ( comment might be sarcasm, or not. It depends. Often I'm not sure either.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ebb tide

The Church didn’t define the family in the first place. All it can do is refuse to recognize reality which is the truth. The sheep keep getting separated from the goats who are on a mission to out themselves.


10 posted on 09/24/2021 3:10:31 PM PDT by Varda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Varda

“Refusing to recognize reality which is the truth” is a good operational definition of insanity.


11 posted on 09/25/2021 9:51:38 AM PDT by Campion (What part of "shall not be infringed" don't they understand?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: ebb tide

Husband and wife and children.

What’s to change?


12 posted on 09/25/2021 9:29:31 PM PDT by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Salvation

Bergoglio greeting homosexual couple in public reception.


Francis Receives Sex-Changed Woman & Her “Fiancée”

13 posted on 09/25/2021 9:41:59 PM PDT by ebb tide (We have a rogue curia in Rome.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson