Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Bob434
Thanks Bob  - diagnostic stuff

Nothing serious yet...

  Yesterday’s Mass Gospel for us was so dang ironic… I wanted to get to my Ipad badly…The Mass Liturgy runs in a 3 year cycle- where we read 90% of the Bible- and then start all over again. (I think that is awesome exposure - compared to the individual systems where the Preacher gets to pick the Gospels he (or she) want to talk about, avoiding that which they don’t)
Anyway its always helpful when the Mass reading just happens to coincide with freeper discussion. But the Gospel reading was Christ telling us it’s better to go to Heaven maimed- by cutting off hand or foot, or plucking out an eye.... rather than live a life with sin. For Christ to Live in us... we must take sin seriously and fight it every step of the way. Confession and Repentance

  Were still far apart on things we don’t agree on – but can’t lose sight on what we do agree on.  But you have to agree the principles of faith you hold onto did not exist for the first 1500 years of Christianity. You can interpret them out of the Bible...but these doctrines don’t appear until the 16 th century.

Briefly on the branches-  it is talking aobut unsaved Jews being cast away and burned- Jews who claimed to be ‘religious’; but who never accepted Christ-

That's how we look back on it... reading into history. But Paul is talking in his day... about the chosen (saved) Jews who rejected the Law of Moses etc. ... they being of the Chosen Natural branch God did not spare...
21 For if God did not spare the natural branches, neither will he spare you. 


"Did not spare" can only mean a verifiable past action, such as the disobedient breaking of his Covenantal law... not a present tense reference to Jews in Rome not converting.
Nor did the Churches in Rome have the Judiazer issue and so Paul was writing to already saved converted Jews in the Church of Rome.
But THE FOCUS of the verse is not really on the who, the subject, Christians in Rome, but how good chose and chooses that which he will "spare" and not spare. For even his FIRST chosen people he may not spare...

those who say “Lord Lord” who will go to hell- or be burned up- ...Those are hte ones Christ spoke of who when i nheaven say “Lord, have we not prophesied in your name?” and Christ says to them “Depart from Me I never knew you”
Note carefully- He said he “NEVER” knew them- in otherwords, they claimed to be Christians, but they Never accepted Him as Savior- they were CINO’s, Christians in name only- ie unsaved- always-


I agree... absolutely. Christ never knew THEM... but they believed THEY KNEW CHRIST... and lived a life "believing" they knew him...

WHY did Christ NOT know them?

So WHAT MAKES someone a CINO?

It has to be something THEY DID or DID NOT DO.... Correct?
Although it is not for us to make this call, we have a big problem with Biden and Pelosi... and even clergy involved in sexual abuse.
  For they were also BAPTIZED INTO JESUS CHRIST (Galatians) by and with unmerited Grace , confirmed with the Holy Spirit... and claim they are worthy to take the Body of Christ into their Body  (whether others don't believe in the Eucharist- THEY do, and claim this their whole life
They claim to be Christians...(not up to me to decide).... are they saved- or were they never Christians to begin with? You see the problem with CINO? One can delude themselves into thinking they are saved.. but if tomorrow they confessed and repented they can be restored to their post-Justification regeneration... but while they cling to sin as the unbaptized do.... they are lost. When obviously, they are disobeying God, like Adam did, like Judas did.

When He says that Christ will Never lose ANY of those that God gives to Him- He means just that- a Saved person can Never be lost- Ever=- otherwise God is a liar- If And a person can go their whole life saved, then make commit a7g terrible sin and die doing so- and that person is lost- then Gold’s word is false-

Well Judas was lost... and was not a surprise... and that doesn’t make God a liar. But I don’t agree you can read that verse in an absolute that NONE will be lost... it’s God’s Will that none be lost... but it does not say absolutely In the end none will actually be lost ... just like where Paul says it is God’s desire that ” All men be saved and come to know the truth”... well we know God’s desire is one thing.... but We know not all will be saved.... similarly some will be lost.

My bible tells me that when a person is saved, —NO— man can pluck that person out of God’s hands- and that includes the man or woman themselves- My bible tells me that —NO— soul given to Christ by God will be lost- None- The verses you cited talk about people Christ —NEVER— Knew, not even briefly- when He said Never, He meant Never- they were never saved-

You read that verse differently or cannot see what Catholics see when they read it:

”I give them eternal life, and they will never perish, AND NO ONE will snatch them out of my hand. My Father, who has given them to me, is greater than all, AND NO ONE is able to snatch them out of the Father's hand.
And also like:
For I am sure that ...... neither death nor life,
nor angels nor rulers,
nor things present
nor things to come,
nor powers,
nor height nor depth,
nor anything else in all creation,
will be able to separate us from the love of God in Christ Jesus our Lord.

In John it’s says No One... can take you or I from God’s hands... we agree on this... no one outside of ourselves.... BUT.IT.DOES.NOT. Say we cannot remove ourselves from God’s hands... ONLY that no one can do that TO US....
St. Paul gets a little more detailed...but again...he outlines quite clearly... NOTHING EXTERNAL TO US can separate us from Christ... but what is MISSING?
“nor ourselves” ..... that we can we be separated by our own doing... I doesn’t say that....Interestingly enough too... and there’s no time to go down that path...but St. Paul finishes with, “nor anything else in ALL creation”.....
Well guess what we battle with everyday that Paul left off the list... and is NOT part of God’s creation?
sin !

[[And not the one the Holy Spirit has guided since the beginning.]] You are giving an opinion and are giving an opinion and frankly a wrong opinion- My bible is full of assurance of Salvation verses-

Not opinion. No where in Church history has this been debated- or opposed as a heresy until reformers of the 16th century. Your reading into history that Church Fathers and theologians throughout history read these “salvation” verses the same way you do... they simply didn’t - and there is no evidence to support your claim of a wrong opinion. It was an idea of the moderns enlightenment.

[[Do you really think St. PAUL was intentionally speaking gibberish about “working out his salvation...”?]] Wow- ok- just briefly- again- working out does not mean ‘working for’- it means working out the gifts which are given the CHristian - IF we have to maintain our salvation, then God’s gift of salvation is no longer a FREE gift, but an earned reward-

Yes I know “work” is a trigger buzz word. But THAT is not important...If Paul believed in guaranteed salvation.... this verse what not even need to exist. Perhaps Paul had knowledge of the Scripture where Jesus infers that one CAN lose their reward when he said:

+++” For truly, I say to you, whoever gives you a cup of water to drink because you bear the name of Christ, will by no means lose his reward. +++Reward-singular)

Who knows where Paul’s preaching is derived from... often though he tells us it what was given him by Christ... and while one may find comfort in “controversial” contestable verses... or contested context even.... the 30,000 ft view is undeniable.
Remember... the epistles are THE EARLIEST writings... much before the Gospels as we know today were yet written.... so Paul was already preaching about sin before the other writers got going.
So can you disagree with the fact that a good majority of Paul’s epistles are writing to his disciples- his converted Christians in Corinth, Galatia Ephesus... and later Phillipi...- saved believing converts - who are in a mess because they are living sinful lives and doing sinful things because they feel they are now immune from judgement of any sin?
If sin could not impact their being in Christ - why all the fuss? Why the fuss over bringing condemnation to the Corinthinians for profaning the Body of Christ in the Eucharist... if they are eternally saved where no such sin could ever separate them? I hope you see what I’m getting at... don’t get hung up on fear... or trembling... but that these passages are being attended to in the first place.
There is absolutely no reason for St. Paul to chastise those disciples who are falling into sin.... NOT following the agospel he had given them.. if there was no serious consequence for their behavior. It does not follow.

Hebrews goes further:
26 For if we sin deliberately after receiving the knowledge of the truth, there no longer remains a sacrifice for sins, 27 but a fearful prospect of judgment, and a fury of fire which will consume the adversaries. 28 A man who has violated the law of Moses dies without mercy at the testimony of two or three witnesses. 29 How much worse punishment do you think will be deserved by the man who has spurned the Son of God, and profaned the blood of the covenant by which he was sanctified, and outraged the Spirit of grace?

In John 10:28-30, Jesus says: “I give them eternal life, and they shall never perish; no one can snatch them out of my hand. My Father, who has given them to me, is greater than all; no one can snatch them out of my Father’s hand. I and the Father are one.”)

IF we have to work to keep our salvation then what are the lines for keeping it? Not committing 5 sins a day? 10? 1? 20? The man who says he is sinless is a liar- ALL sin is serious- No matter how inconsequential it may seem to someone- ALL sin separates us from God


Counting sins? what you just wrote is something a non-believer encounters a Christian with. Yes we sin. And we have been given the redemption by which our sins are forgiven. But 2 things must happen here... ONE .. we have to ASK to be forgiven.. and secondly ...we must forgive OTHERS their trespasses against us... or we will not be forgiven by God either.
So yes, again we must “DO” something to cooperate with the Grace God has given us-unmerited.
Yes, it would seem Christ is quite demanding of us.... “Count the cost...” we are cautioned... “Be perfect,as your Father in Heaven is perfect” Yes, it is not going to be easy...Remember though... ONLY UNREPENTANT sin can keep us from God.... as God is a Merciful God.... when we show we are deserving of his mercy....

As C.S. Lewis wrote about Christians...sure we will sin... but it’s how we pick ourselves back up and get going again is what determines Our sincerity... Godknows our hearts... there’s no fooling God In that process....

Paul spoke to a couple of churches that were severely back-slidden- severely carnal, Like committing ‘really big sins’ as a way of life- He spoke to them NOT as ‘Former brothers and sisters in Christ” but as “Fellow Brothers and sisters in Christ”- They were not working to maintain their salvation, nor did Paul expect them to- He did warn them that they were in danger of chastisement if they didn’t start to obey God- and he did encourage them to remember their first love and get back to it- He spoke to them as Saved people- not as unsaved people who had lost their salvation- That fact too can not be over looked

Chastisement? Why? Why would the be chastised for sins we know we are humanly unable to avoid? Either sin matters or it doesn’t... there’s no partial view of sin...
If their sins are simply now covered up.... there should be no problem... hell, “sin boldly... but believe more boldly”... That’s NOT what Paul is saying to those Churches...in fact he lets them know on a personal level...

”
 But I discipline my body and keep it under control,[b] lest after preaching to others I myself should be disqualified.”

Again.... make no sense in a once saved always saved theology... none whatsoever.


Again- I’m not going to go over all the controversial verses in the bible- if you don’t wish to believe that Christ will never lose any of His own that are given to Him, then i don’;t know what to tell you- other than do a serious study on ‘assurances of salvation in the bible’ with commentary on the verses-


I agree ... scripture quote mining is not what we do. Don’t misunderstand me. There ARE assurances of salvation for us in the Bible for sure... the fact we find them not to be automatic and absolute does not make our situation dire at all.
There are assurances... but we must cooperate with those Graces we receive everyday of our lives the best we can... we are called to be Holy... not simply re-assured....
The New Testament would be a much thinner book if sin and sinfulness were not considered critical to our “persevering to the end”   
Again- I’m not going to go over all the controversial verses in the bible- if you don’t wish to believe that Christ will never lose any of His own that are given to Him, then i don’;t know what to tell you- other than do a serious study on ‘assurances of salvation in the bible’ with commentary on the verses-

I agree ... scripture quote mining is not what we do well... too many interpretations that can render scripture meaningless... except for on an individual level...

Don’t misunderstand me. I know and believe there ARE assurances of salvation for us in the Bible for sure... the fact we find them NOT to be automatic and absolute does not make our situation Any the more dire at all.
There are assurances... but we must cooperate with those Graces we receive everyday of our lives the best we can... we are called to be Holy... not simply re-assured....
The New Testament would be a much thinner book if sin and sinfulness were not considered critical to our “persevering to the end”


52 posted on 02/26/2022 12:15:36 AM PST by MurphsLaw ("But be doers of the word, and not hearers only, deceiving yourselves.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]


To: MurphsLaw

[[But you have to agree the principles of faith you hold onto did not exist for the first 1500 years of Christianity]]

That isn’t true at all. Salvation has zlways been faith in the redeemer/Christ. Before the new testament, Christ was simply known as the redeemer, prophesied of, yet to come, but alive in heaven. The old testament folks who were truly saved were actuslly Christians, they just didn’t have a name for it yet. There were .a great many saved jews when Jesus was crucified. They were saved even before he went to the cross and died.

I see you are touching on more and more known skeptical verses whi h seem to indicate a loss of salvation. Again, careful reading, in context, considering whom the passage is about in many cases, tells us thst those verses do not co traditional once saved always saved. I gave you a good link onmthe issue of the natural,branches. Those jews were jews that had adopted other gods and were not saved. The passage and taking into account who the passage was written to makes that clear that this was specifically about jews who were not saved, and was not about gentile Christians. The link I gave explains in detail

[[agree... absolutely. Christ never knew THEM... but they believed THEY KNEW CHRIST... and lived a life “believing” they knew him...]]

This isn’t true either. Unsaved peop,e who pretend to be saved know in their hearts they are unsaved. God isn’t going to trick anyone, and he always let’s them know through his spirit who convicts them. They can learn to ignore the conviction of the holy spirit, but they know full well they aren’t saved. Despite their claims,to,the contrary. God has written the universal moral code o. Everyone’s heart, and everyonemgoung to hell does so knowing that thye are at odds with the creator.

What makes themma cino is the fsct thatnthey never ac epted Christ, butmthey claim to have. There are many many religions that speak,a good game, but who do not preach salvation through Christ alone- these are false Christians, cinos.

You go on to state that they perform certain Christian rituals, but none of those save. Only faith in Christ saves. Religious but unsaved people go through all,manner of rituals and baptisms and whatnot, but they have never accepted christ as savior. We can’t earn our way to heaven by following religious rituals and rites etc.

Gettingmback,to,Getting back,, very important point of whether we can lose salvation or not, it can’t be so because the moment we state that we must maintain our salvation, we have room to brag that we save ourselves by our good deeds and by abstaining from sin, whi h is entirely impossible this side of heaven.

When we claim we can lose salvation and re-earn it, it is no longer “Christ alone” but now becomes “Christ plus my pious living” that earns salvation

To,be saved means to repent. To repent simply means to “have a change of mind”. It doesn’t mean turning your back,on sins because that is impossible- no man can do so, and an unsaved person has no desire whatsoever to even try because their sin nature is at enmity with God. They do not have the holy spirit yet. So,it,is impossible for them to will themselves into a,”good enough state” of sinlessness so that Christ is obliged to accept,them into,the family.

How much sin does one need to remove from their lives in order to be saved? ALL sin. Even the little things and unseen things, and things we don’t even know we are doing, because to be saved is to be perfectly sinless before God. The only way to achieve that is to,have a change of mind about HOW one must be saved. No longer shoukd,should, person think,that anything they do saves them. Only Christ can save. Our works are as filthy rags and totally unacceptable to God.

When we finally come to,the point where we say to God “ok lord, I’m done trying to,save myself, and I throw myself at your feet a miserable sinner incapable of working for,my salvation, therefore i call onmthe name of Christ alone to,save me” will such a person be saved because they finally repented.

Passages that seem to,indicate saved,people losing salvation almost a.ways are talking about unsaved people pretending they are saved, and who are trying to earn their way to salvation. Those are the people,Christ will,say “depart from me I never knew you” to. Those passages are fair earning to,such people to get their acts together and and stop,trying to be pious “religious folks” who benefit fro the church, but who never accept Christ. They get very close to salvation, know all the words, and might even sound saved, but if you talk to,them long enough you will,find they never repented, thstmtheynare just along for the ride.

Thrse posts are getting too long- too many trails to explore- all,I can real,y say at this point is that once saved a,ways saved has to,be true because the moment we say that we must maintain our salvation, we take salvation completely out-of Christ’s hands and plunk it squarely on ourselves. Paul and the apostles and Christ,warned agaisn this, stating clearly that salvation is not earned lest any man should boast

I suppose someone could say that they aren’t boasting when they say they are maintaining their own salvation, butmthey are boasting because God has c,early stated all through his word,even In the old testament, that salvation comes by faith alone, not works lest any man should beast. Saying that we must maintain our own salvation is boasting really.

There is a term I can’t quite recall but i think is something,oiek,the word “dispensia” or soemthing like,that. It meansmthst when a basic bliblical truthmis established, any passages that seem to contradict it must mean something else, because the truth is so,profound that it stands on its own and can’t be shaken because God can not lie. When God said that noonemthat he gives christ will be lost, that is a major biblical truth. And when he says that we are sealed forever by the holy spirit, he means it. Anythingmthat contradicts this must either be read wrong, misinterpreted, or plain wrong. Since God’s word is infallible, we know,that it can’t be wrong, so it must be misinterpreted if it seems to,contradict a major biblical,truth.

God has alwaysmmaintained that salvation is solely through the redeemer. He says so many times. If it is solely through the redeemer, then it can’t be through anything that we do to “keep” it.

Judas was never saved- ever. There are many sermons on this issue, so,no, he wasn’t saved then lost.

[[BUT.IT.DOES.NOT. Say we cannot remove ourselves from God’s hands... ONLY that no one can do that TO US.... ]]

It,is,a given thst even we can’t remove ourselves from salvation because we are sealed- no conditions for that sealing. Salvation is a gift, not earned. Again, we can’t maintain our salvation because doing so is earning, and is in direct opposition to his word that tells us we are filthy rags incapable of good deeds. You keep,ignoring this very important point, and the reasons it is so important is because it proves that we can never be good enough to save oj4selves or to get to a point where christ then says “ok, good eneough, I’m now obliged to save you again.

We are going round and round in circles here I’m afraid. There is no escaping 2 very important points- 1 we can never be good,enough that christ will then be obliged to save us again, because as Paul makes abundantly clear, our best deeds are as dirty grimy filthy foul smellingmrags,smelling rags, God. 2 being saved is strictly an act performed by christ, not us, but if we say we must maintain our salvation, the we take it out of his hands and now our salvationmrelies on our “good deeds”, hoping I guess to “do,enough good deeds that it outweighs the bad ones so that God will be obliged to save us again. 3we must repent, ie have a change of mind about HOW we are saved in order to be saved. When we come to,realize that nothing we do can make us perfectly sinless so thst we can be in the presence of God, thenmwe,fall at Christ’s feet and empty ourselves of all effort and ask him for mercy and grace because we don’t deserve it, can’t earn it, and don’t even want it apart from HIS drawing us to Him. We bow in humble realization thst nothing we do can ever be clean enough, sinless enough, rest enough to cover our sins, and therefore we fall upon the mercy of the only sinless perfect sacrifice to ever have lived, and we thank,God for loving us enough to,draw us to him and that realization.

[[Chastisement? Why?]]

Because that is what God does to protect us. He corrects bad behavior for our own good. We can ,intentionally to him, accept,th punishment, or reject it and walk off,in a huff, but we are stil. Saved. The point was that severely carnal Christian churches were called brothers and sisters, not “former brothers and sisters”- they didn’t lose their salvation, and the sins they were including in were “whoppers” by today’s standards.

We’ve gone over the above key points several times now. My answers remain the same- we can’t maintain because they woild mean we are responsible for our salvation, not christ, because without our “trying to,be good enough” we woild,not be saved if we were able to lose salvation. Also we could then brag if we were honest with ourselves and admitted that what was really going on was we save ourselves by our efforts if we could,lose salvation. There’s just no getting around that. We can be fake and say with false humility that “oh no, it’s not me that saves, but Christ alone” but the very belief that we must maintain our own salvation shows,that we don’t really,beleive it is only,christ, but also,our efforts, which Paul told us we,can not do,because we,c an never be good enough to maintain ourmsalvation.


53 posted on 02/26/2022 7:14:35 AM PST by Bob434
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson