Posted on 07/15/2022 6:20:21 PM PDT by marshmallow
WASHINGTON, D.C. (LifeSiteNews) – Democrat Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi brushed off criticism of her pro-abortion stance conflicting with her Catholic self-identification Thursday on the grounds that, as a woman, she was capable of becoming pregnant and male popes are not.
“Republicans sometimes have said Nancy Pelosi thinks she knows more about having babies than the Pope. Yes, I do. I think any Pope would agree,” Pelosi, who has five children, said at a press conference, Just the News reported. Her support for legal abortion-on-demand is about “respect, freedom, of reproductive health for women and it’s not about politicians negotiating that away,” she added.
For the past year, pro-abortion “Catholic” politicians have been outraged by by the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops’ (USCCB’s) June 2021 vote to draft a document that pro-lifers hope and pro-aborts fear could lead to a policy of denying Holy Communion to American politicians complicit in protecting or expanding the legality of abortion.
(Excerpt) Read more at lifesitenews.com ...
The issue is not “having babies”; the issue is “not having” babies.
She must be one of those “scientists” that Biden’s lame SCOTUS pic isn’t.
Is she a doctographer?
Translation: Little people aren’t good enough to give birth 🤪
Just like “Reproductive” rights, health, etc. actually means “Non-reproductive” rights, health, etc. As long as you know that everything they say means the opposite, Democrats are consistent.
The issue has NOTHING to do with the mechanics of childbirth.
It has everything to do with the morality of childbirth.
All people are moral agents and therefore they can speak on any and all moral issues equally, regardless of sex.
Unless we can start treating women unequal because they are women, and we can tell them to shut up about certain things because “no penis, no opinion”.
By Pelosi’s warped sexist kind of logic, men can also exclude women from many, many decisions because they are women.
Of course she thinks as a woman, that will not be allowed to happen.
If Pelosi isn’t a biologist how can she be sure what a woman is let alone knowing what a baby is? 🤔
The term “reproductive rights “ sounds like an animal breeding program.
Right now there’s some professor of hyphenated studies at UC Berkley desperately trying to figure out if “the pope can’t get pregnant” is a brilliant clapback by a liberal icon, or the worst type of word violence that has ever been uttered.
If she gets pregnant, the Pope will likely want to see that miracle for two reasons: 1) at her age, it would be a miracle, and 2) finding anyone who wants to plant that seed would be a second miracle.
Abortion is about killing babies, not having them.
Playing God. That’s our Nanzi.
Nancy, haven't you heard? Men can become pregnant too.
Time to impeach Ms. Pelosi for her insensitivity.
Where is the Woke Left when you need them?
Ping
So now she imagines she’s head of the church too?
No surprise. Just a shame that the first woman pope had to be Pelousy.
Well Nancy, you don’t have to worry about a Pope. You should be concerned about one day standing before Jesus.
Listen to her freak out when someone asks her about Trump running in 2024.
https://twitter.com/bennyjohnson/status/1547961402911969281?s=21&t=6Z6d8zsmPDoIHPgVtZ6b5Q
“The term ‘reproductive rights’ sounds like an animal breeding program.”
Catholic theology actually uses the word procreate, human beings co-create a body with God, He directly creates the soul. Of course, ideologue, fake Catholic Nancy doesn’t know this. Terms like “reproductive” or “reproduction” reduce human beings to animals. Communism reduces human beings to objects to be used and/or discarded.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.