Posted on 09/02/2022 7:31:41 PM PDT by marshmallow
Fifty-two percent of U.S. Catholic schools participate in the federal lunch program, according to the National Catholic Educational Association.
The U.S. Department of Agriculture has reversed a policy that would have required Catholic schools that participate in a federal free lunch program to comply with the Biden administration’s LGBTQ mandates.
Nevertheless, some Catholic schools, such as those of the Archdiocese of St. Louis, are choosing to drop out of the program.
Earlier this year the Biden administration re-interpreted Title IX's federal ban on sex discrimination to include “sexual orientation or gender identity.” Religious freedom and free speech advocates warn that the change could be used to enforce mandates on hiring, bathrooms, using preferred pronouns, and dress codes.
The broadened definition also applies to the National School Lunch Program, a federally funded meal assistance program administered by the Department of Agriculture that provides subsidized or free lunches to more than 30 million public and private school students from low-income households.
On Aug. 12, the department published a memo saying that although the rule applies to most public and private schools across the country, it includes an exception for schools to “be exempt on religious grounds if there is a conflict between Title IX and a school’s governing religious tenets.”
(Excerpt) Read more at ncregister.com ...
A perfect example of the strings attached when government funds something. Ostensibly, the program is designed to provide school lunches for needy kids. (I know it covers a lot more than the needy kids now.) Now, unless a school gets with the social engineering agenda of the government — or any other cause it wants to push — well, I guess that’s just too bad for the kids. Of course, I expect most public schools will comply. It would be nice if more schools would follow the lead of the Archdiocese of St. Louis and find alternatives so they can tell the feds where to shove their lunches.
Protecting federally funded school lunches from political whims, could be a conservative campaign point.
Not a major one, but it’s one more thing that can sway voters.
Why?
Where are the GOP adds about the rats withholding food from children unless the school goes along with the LBTG fascists? Well?
and you watch when a republican president does away with the requirements they will be accused of ‘;causing irreparable harm to lgbtq students’ blah blah blah
nowhere to be found of course- republicans Will NOT fight the enemy!
If you take ANY money from Government, you are controlled by them.
If a child’s parents can’t figure out a way to pack them a simple lunch, then the child really should be at a public school anyway.
No government funds, no government control.
The old axiom still applies. Whatever the government funds, the government runs.
I think SCOTUS ruled against discrimination towards religious schools. So the USDA is “agreeing” to follow the court.
I guess we are supposed to be grateful about this?
Because parents have to pay taxes for schools they are not sending their kids to, and also pay tuition.
It’s private schooling so they find ways to be competitive with expenses.
“If you take ANY money from Government, you are controlled by them.”
____________________
Soc security and Medicare come to mind......
I’m from the government and I’m here to help you.
Earlier this month... a private Christian school in Tampa, Florida, had to file a lawsuit against the administration in order to secure a religious exemption from the rule, which could have forced the school to comply with policies on bathrooms, pronouns, hiring, and dress codes.Represented by ADF [Alliance Defending Freedom], the school was granted an exemption by the state’s agricultural department, restoring the funds for its school lunch program.
Erica Steinmiller-Perdomo, legal counsel at ADF, [said]... that it took a lawsuit for the administration to backtrack on forcing religious schools to comply with its “radical push to redefine what it means to be male or female in federal law.”
“After ADF’s lawsuit, USDA made clear that they will automatically respect religious exemptions under Title IX for religious schools—for now,”...[b]ut public schools, charter schools, and secular private schools... remain under threat. Plus, other federal laws that lack religious exemptions may also apply. As long as the Biden Administration seeks to redefine what it means to be male or female in all federal laws, religious schools risk being punished just for maintaining Christian beliefs,” she added…
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.