Posted on 09/18/2022 4:03:22 PM PDT by ebb tide
Very few newspapers spoke of the self-styled Pope Francis at the interreligious meeting held in recent days in Astana, the capital of Kazakhstan. Bergoglio is not the pope, as you know, because Benedict XVI has never abdicated, but he has been in the Impeded See for nine years, as documented with encyclopedic clarity by the investigation conducted on this page, later collected in the volume "Ratzinger Code", (Byoblu May 2022).
It is striking that, with an investigation of this ubiquitous kind on the web and the inclusion of the volume (now translated into Spanish) among the ten Italian bestsellers, Pope Benedict has just written to the Gioachimiti Studies center: “In the historical action of God, truth gradually reveals itself”.
However, that the Astana congress was cornered is understandable: the meeting was hot because it would predictably have given way to Bergoglio's masonic-syncretist itches, as in fact it happened on time and as we will show you on the basis of the report of the Vatican news agency.
The anti-pope's entire speech, which you will find HERE, is tinged with an exquisitely Masonic concept, expressed in such a continuous and hammering way as to be taken for granted: God is one, for all, who calls him Allah, Mazda, Javeh, Christ, Trimurti, Jehovah ... but in the end it is always the same subject.
Be careful not to be fooled: this is not the case at all for Catholic doctrine, for which only the Trinitarian God of Christianity is true, only Jesus is the Way, the Truth and the Life, while the other religions are false. Revelation has made God manifest in all His identity to man through His Son, who "died for our salvation, gloriously rose again and ascended into heaven", etc.
And here, instead, is the sentence tweeted by Bergoglio yesterday at 11.49 am HERE which is configured as a double, patent heresy: "Faced with the mystery of the infinite that dominates and attracts us, religions remind us that we are creatures: we are not omnipotent, but women and men on the way to the same celestial goal".
Same heavenly goal? What are you talking about? Each religion has a different idea of the otherworldly goal. Suffice it to think that Buddha proposes reincarnation and Nirvana, which is the annihilation of the individual, while Christ instead promises Eternal Life which preserves all his individuality to the soul. Two sidereally opposed visions. Not to mention the salvation in Islam, guaranteed only to Muslims: "If God promises believers the unlimited happiness of the gardens, on the other hand, he reserves the painful punishment of hell for the unbelievers (cf. Cor. 9: 72-73).” HERE, a radically different conception from the Christian one. We are therefore in total theological collateralism.
Moreover, the construction of the sentence in a merciful sense is very insidious: creatures, not omnipotent, are on their way to a heavenly goal. But it is not true, from the point of view of faith, because men and women, as creatures, are not all on the way to a heavenly goal, both because there are so many sinful human creatures who walk towards hell, and because the mere fact having any religion does not automatically entail salvation. The phrase fits perfectly, however, if we suppose that all men go to heaven according to Bergoglian mercy., that is, the heresy of the Apocatastasis already quashed in the third century. So yes, in this case we are all indiscriminately on the way to a celestial goal. However, this stuff is not Christian, but it is pure Bergogliism, which we wrote about HERE.
Already at the beginning of his speech, Bergoglio starts off on the wrong foot. Vatican News reports: "With his hand on his chest, the Pope makes a small bow with his head before taking the floor and delivering a long and weighty speech".
The typically Masonic gesture of the hand on the chest is conveniently cut out in the videos that circulate, but if the Vatican agency has reported it, we can believe it.
Immediately anti-Pope Francis attacks with the Masonic refrain of universal brotherhood: "In the name of that brotherhood which unites everyone as sons and daughters of the same heaven...”. But weren't we children of Mother Earth? Apart from these doubts, once again, men in different religions do not consider themselves children of the same god at all. Moreover, from a Catholic point of view, men are brothers only in two respects: one biological, as belonging to the human species, and the other spiritual, only as children of the Trinitarian God, Father, Son and Holy Spirit, in the grace of Baptism. A brotherhood as children of one and the same indistinct God is completely excluded. Such a BLUE THEOLOGICAL ERROR it is, instead, coincidentally, a totally Masonic conception: the Great Architect of the Universe created the world and mankind: different peoples have given this entity different names, but in the end it is always the same indistinct and unknown god who minds his own business and disregards mankind. Voltaire's Deist conception explains it well: this cosmic geometer is as interested in men as a vizier sunbathing on the deck of his ship might be interested in the rats in the hold.
The syncretistic Masonic concept is shamelessly reiterated in this passage by the antipope: "Religions are not problems, but part of the solution for a more harmonious coexistence". The quest for transcendence and the sacred value of fraternity can in fact “inspire and illuminate the choices to be made in the context of the geopolitical, social, economic, ecological but, at the root, spiritual crises that run through many of today's institutions, including democracies, jeopardizing security and harmony among peoples”. There is therefore a need for religion "to respond to the world's thirst for peace and the thirst for the infinite that inhabits the heart of every man ".
But not at all: except that, historically, religions have always been enormously divisive, but for the Catholic faith only Christ is the living water that quenches the thirst for the infinite.
Another refrain of Free Masonry: the fundamentalist opposition to the death penalty. In fact, Bergoglio immediately praised the Kazakh president for abolishing the death sentence, and this reminds us of his abusive change of the Catechism to Art. 2267 which, in 2018, made the death penalty always and in any case inadmissible in the Magisterium.
Warning: from the Catholic point of view, however, there may be rare borderline cases in which the death penalty can be morally contemplated, such as the case of unsafe prisons. While it is true that modern Western societies can protect the common good by imprisoning criminals in well-equipped prisons, it is not necessarily the case that these can be guaranteed in the thousands of uncivilised disaster areas around the world where detention facilities are often in poor condition.
You must not believe the writer, but Pope John Paul II who, while confirming in the Catechism of the Catholic Church the lawfulness of the death penalty if there is no other way to effectively defend human lives, concludes: "If , on the other hand, bloodless means are sufficient to defend against the aggressor and to protect the safety of persons, the authority will limit itself to these means, since they are better suited to the concrete conditions of the common good and are more in keeping with the dignity of the human person” .
Therefore Catholicism certainly discourages the death penalty where it is possible, but it cannot exclude it a priori as always morally inadmissible. Whether one agrees with it or not is beside the point: Catholicism says this and Bergoglio, with his abusive change, has distorted the Magisterium in compliance to a historic demand of Freemasonry.
Mortifying, then, is the out-of-time vaccinist bluster: “How many, even today, do not have easy access to vaccines! We are on their side, not on the side of those who have more and give less”.
The only explanation for this release you can easily understand is from the never denied meetings between Bergoglio and Pfizer CEO, Albert Bourla during 2020 HERE
Another inane absurdity that can be commented on is the equation of the rights of children to be born with the alleged right of migrants to move to other countries: “Every day, unborn babies and children, migrants and the elderly are discarded. So many brothers and sisters die sacrificed on the altar of profit, surrounded by the sacrilegious incense of indifference. Yet every human being is sacred”.
A big mess in compliance with the usual Masonic Kalergi Plan immigrationism, with the ethnic replacement of Europeans aimed at creating a new hybrid man without a homeland, identity, religion, culture etc. easily dominated by the usual elites.
In short, who knows how many other masonic and globalist pearls are hidden in Bergoglio's speech. Frankly, these are enough for now. If you manage to survive the diabetic coma caused by the treacle of Deamicist banalities, have fun finding some more HERE
Ping
Not my Pope.
They are the front for ancient bloodlines who believe the earth and everything on it belongs to them.
Now the Pope is a sleeper closet Freemason!
To paraphrase Milton Friedman: There is no such thing as a free mason.
Spoiler alert… it’s a Masonic plot begun in the 1800s.
There is nothing in Masonic rituals which involves a static hand on the chest, though there signs which are motions across the upper body symbolizing throat-slashing, breast (chest) torn apart, and disemboweling.
Many Masons can be seen with hands across their chests, but this is not part of any formal ritual.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.