As hard as it may be, they need to close their dorms
So if I am reading this correctly...the courts basically said, in effect, “we don’t think you have a problem yet - come back to us if you do in the future.” however, that obviously exposes them to potential fines and they wanted this resolved before such a conflict arose.
Harm hasn’t occurred yet so where’s the standing?
We’ve been assured repeatedly that gender has nothing to do with sex. How exactly then can a statute that deals explicitly with sex be construed to pertain to gender?
So the courts wait for the white house to cross that line.
The school heavily screens its prospective students and has an 8%acceptance rate.
Why make it a legal issue? Just announce school policy that it is not allowed.
“The U.S. Supreme Court left this issue unresolved,...” In the name of transparency, who wrote the decision? How many justices took part? And none of that crap that we’ll get back to it later on. Are we left to assume that the Supreme Court is as cowardly, as phony as the Department of Justice?
“That’s because the government has never charged the college with sex discrimination in its housing”
This is standard. The Court will NOT hear challenges that are not “ripe,” that is, if no one has actually been injured, they won’t hear a case just to establish “hypotheticals.” That, in their minds, is WRITING law (it is). COTO can come back if and when they are actually charged with something.
People must insist that “gender identity” has no standing.
There are no limits to tyranny...